1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Jagger 2 Update Info - October 26, 2005

Discussion in 'Google' started by john_robot, Oct 26, 2005.

  1. Nathan Malone

    Nathan Malone Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    369
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #41
    Hmm, it looks like the results are a little more relevant now, at least on the searches I tried. We'll see what Jagger 3 brings...
    SEMrush
     
    Nathan Malone, Oct 26, 2005 IP
    SEMrush
  2. sGroup

    sGroup Peon

    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    16
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #42
    We don't see any change from Jagger1 to Jagger2 - Will be interesting to see how it all ends up.
     
    sGroup, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  3. Jim4767

    Jim4767 Prominent Member

    Messages:
    4,643
    Likes Received:
    736
    Best Answers:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    305
    #43
    Me, too. First a nice jump, now rolling back by 1/3.
     
    Jim4767, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  4. diamondsinfo

    diamondsinfo Peon

    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #44
    May be rolling out by topic or industry like Jagger 1 - I did not see any effect of that until the very end.
     
    diamondsinfo, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  5. jwbond

    jwbond Guest

    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #45
    I am not sure sites are being overranked due to size or age.

    For my industry, i have the largest most content rich sites (note: I was released from the sandbox in the superbowl update). however, most of my competitors are older and have seen good increases in the recent updates while i have seen major drops (mainly in my secondary keywords)
     
    jwbond, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  6. jlawrence

    jlawrence Peon

    Messages:
    1,368
    Likes Received:
    81
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #46
    From a very quick check, I'm seeing pre jagger1 results on the .9.xxx & .11.xxx DC's :D
     
    jlawrence, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  7. jestep

    jestep Prominent Member Premium Member

    Messages:
    3,661
    Likes Received:
    215
    Best Answers:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    330
    #47
    I'm not seeing any significant changes either. Ebay and craigslist listings are still in with the normal SERPS. Nothing that I can see so far shows any improvement in any areas since the update started.
     
    jestep, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  8. baseballcube

    baseballcube Peon

    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #48
    No changes here either and I'm in sports.

    I'm still worried that Jagger sandboxed a lot of newer sites because I had 2 domains with similar content and only one of them (the newer one) was affected. Very strange.
     
    baseballcube, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  9. quarryshark

    quarryshark Peon

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #49
     
    quarryshark, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  10. mcdar

    mcdar Peon

    Messages:
    1,831
    Likes Received:
    110
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #50
    I'm seeing the "new" results on 64.233.167.* datacenters now as well!

    64.233.167.99
    64.233.167.104
    66.102.9.99
    66.102.9.104
    66.102.11.99
    66.102.11.104

    Caryl
     
    mcdar, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  11. cmeinck

    cmeinck Active Member

    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #51
    I use Advanced Web Ranking -- added the .104 datacenter where the changes are appearing. While I've experienced a drop in traffic from Google since Jagger 1, the keywords I track held their ground for the most part. Out of 67 keywords, the .104 datacenter shows the addition of 2 keywords up to 55. Those 2 keywords are also in the Top 10 which is nice. AWR provides you with a "visibility score" -- mine has gone from 69.4% to 71.59%. Not earth shattering, but I'll take any increase. The good news is that 2 of my competitor's rankings went down.

    If this update held it's ground, I'd be content, but I presume we still have another update to get through.

    Good luck to all with Jagger 2 and 3.
     
    cmeinck, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  12. Lucky Bastard

    Lucky Bastard Peon

    Messages:
    406
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #52
    The results still aren't great for me.

    One of the sites that ranked #4 (homepage) for a particular competitive keyword term before Jagger 1, dropped out to the 300s, and is now (Since Jagger 2 started) ONLY ranking in the 50s, and it isn't even the homepage. If the homepage was ranking it would probably be in the top 10, but the homepage is nowhere to be seen in the SERPS. Yes it is indexed and cached.

    Why would that be the case? The homepage for the keyword I am looking up would be much stronger than this subpage that is now ranking in the 50s.
     
    Lucky Bastard, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  13. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #53
    I'm seeing this too. Incorrect pages listed for various keywords causing a drop in rankings. I think its temporary though and it'll shake out later.
     
    lorien1973, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  14. Lucky Bastard

    Lucky Bastard Peon

    Messages:
    406
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #54
    Yep, fingers crossed, my homepage comes in and knocks the site off that is ranking #1 by the time Jagger the Second matures :)
     
    Lucky Bastard, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  15. subnet_rx

    subnet_rx Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    141
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    138
    #55
    I agree on waiting on this. I don't think anyone should take any measures on their SEO strategy until Jagger3 is done.
     
    subnet_rx, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  16. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #56
    I don't think anyone should take any action at all until they stop calling it Jagger. This has to be the dumbest name ever for an update :mad:
     
    minstrel, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  17. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #57
    Yeah, but I think google would be too obvious if they call it "bent over the googleplex 2005" :p
     
    lorien1973, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  18. mitchandre

    mitchandre Peon

    Messages:
    313
    Likes Received:
    33
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #58
    Looks like I'm still unaffected.
     
    mitchandre, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  19. aeiouy

    aeiouy Peon

    Messages:
    2,876
    Likes Received:
    275
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #59
    Apparently they had no choice since Yahoo's Update is called "Wood".
     
    aeiouy, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  20. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #60
    Judging by the comments of many on this forum, they could have called it "Pecker" :D

    I was spared the upheaval that many members have reported...
     
    minstrel, Oct 26, 2005 IP