Social Buttons
  1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Jagger 2 Update Info - October 26, 2005

Discussion in 'Google' started by john_robot, Oct 26, 2005.

0
Page 2 of 11
  1. aeiouy

    aeiouy Peon

    Messages:
    2,876
    Likes Received:
    275
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #21
    I like some of what I see on 66.102.9.104, and some of it I don't like that much.
    SEMrush
    Will be interesting to see how it ends up.
     
    aeiouy, Oct 26, 2005 IP
    SEMrush
  2. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #22
    The blog said it'd take a few days to iron out. I don't see any changes for any of my sites, so I'm blah on it all. I'm hoping it gets better.

    I'm seeing the wrong pages indexed for the wrong phrases too, which ticks me off too.
     
    lorien1973, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  3. cray

    cray Peon

    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #23
    My traffic is up quite a bit today so far.....
     
    cray, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  4. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #24
    Dontcha just hate when that happens? I mean, you're trying to have a nap (Crazy_Rob will know what I mean) and suddenly there are buses and dump trucks and kids in Hondas with bass booming all over the damn place :mad:

    "What is the point? I mean, what is the bloody point??!!?" ~ Basil Fawlty, Fawlty Towers
     
    minstrel, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  5. nlgordaz

    nlgordaz Peon

    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #25
    I have a question:
    I have a site that lost all of its high rankings in this last Google update. I was relying mostly on relevant recip links. Where it does rank now, only the sub pages are in the SERPs, never the home page that has all of the links going to it. I just starting optimizing this site a couples months ago and in that time I've added about 80 relevant recip links, so they are all new. I do recall before I begin building links mostly the sub-pages where only ranking pages also. Did G just revert back to the old SERPs in regards to this site and just disregard all the new links? Any other ideas that could cause this? BTW, the site is old, but the links are new.

    Thanks
     
    nlgordaz, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  6. mcdar

    mcdar Peon

    Messages:
    1,831
    Likes Received:
    110
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #26
    minstrel,
    :confused:

    Can I have some of whatever you are having?:D

    Caryl

    edited: OH -TRAFFIC - I get it now - duh
     
    mcdar, Oct 26, 2005 IP
    minstrel likes this.
  7. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #27
    No current SERPs as same as the past week. Something new is going on on a few data centers, but I don't think its public yet. And I don't think what is on those data centers is live either. Its still very much sit and wait.
     
    lorien1973, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  8. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #28
    Since minstrel has been blogging about "psychiatrists prescribing drugs for like 5 months now" I have to think he's been prescribing them to himself :)
     
    lorien1973, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  9. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #29
    :D

    I was referring to this:

    :eek:
     
    minstrel, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  10. mcdar

    mcdar Peon

    Messages:
    1,831
    Likes Received:
    110
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #30
    Johann,
    ALL Datacenters are live!

    It is just a matter of which one you get routed to when you enter www.google.com for the url.

    HINT: When you do a search on www.google.com, do a mouse over the Cached link for any of the results.

    If you look down at the bottom left of your browser window you should see something like...
    http://[B]216.239.57.99[/B]/search?q=cache:... (the numbers bolded would be the IP address of the Datacenter you were routed to.)

    Caryl
     
    mcdar, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  11. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #31
    I never noticed that before, man. LOL
     
    lorien1973, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  12. Aok

    Aok Peon

    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #32
    I have to admint, using the DC that Matt suggested, I am finally seeing good improvements in my serps, some returning to almost pre-Jagger spots.
     
    Aok, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  13. themetalpeddler

    themetalpeddler Peon

    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #33
    That data center shows some improvements on a few KWs but not many. Most are still terrible with spammy sites in top 10

    Google traffic today to my site: 1
     
    themetalpeddler, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  14. mcdar

    mcdar Peon

    Messages:
    1,831
    Likes Received:
    110
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #34
    I'm seeing the "new" results on 66.102.11.* datacenters now as well!

    66.102.9.99
    66.102.9.104
    66.102.11.99
    66.102.11.104

    Caryl
     
    mcdar, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  15. Cygnus

    Cygnus Cat Herder

    Messages:
    172
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    108
    #35
    Cygnus, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  16. gford

    gford Peon

    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    33
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #36
    Now that is funny! :D
     
    gford, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  17. lorien1973

    lorien1973 Notable Member

    Messages:
    12,206
    Likes Received:
    601
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    260
    #37
    I rank behind a 404 page and a blatant affiliate link for at least 2 keywords that I know. Now, that's painful!

    EDIT - I just checked. I know outrank the 404 page (sweet) but I am still behind the affiliate link.

    I do still rank behind someone's forum username (not this forum) - that is the brand name for this particular product.

    1 .edu (fine)
    2 manufacturers retail site
    3 affiliate
    4 forum profile page
    5 (indented) review page for said forum (random, totally unrelated product)
    6 affiliate link
    7 me!
    8 404 page
    9 affiliate page
    10 affiliate page
     
    lorien1973, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  18. Sharpseo

    Sharpseo Peon

    Messages:
    653
    Likes Received:
    52
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #38
    Same here. My site that is rebounding on that DC got hit on Sept. 22nd. SERPs are not quite as good as they were before, but at least they aren't completely gone on that datacenter.

    It will be interesting to see what Jagger3 brings.
     
    Sharpseo, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  19. Cygnus

    Cygnus Cat Herder

    Messages:
    172
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    108
    #39
    I can deal with ranking behind affiliates, but not the 404s...I'm sure your site will eventually trump it Johann.

    Edit: Okay, since you editted...I told you that you'd trump it! :)
     
    Cygnus, Oct 26, 2005 IP
  20. flyguy

    flyguy Peon

    Messages:
    198
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #40
    Jagger2 appears to be a much better set of results than jagger 1. From what I'm seeing anyway.
     
    flyguy, Oct 26, 2005 IP
Page 2 of 11