still nothing relevant to say eh blog? Yep.. was an accident that those soldiers raped iraqi women, set them on fire, and murdered their families..... just an accident..... they're the good guys!
I say again: it is not the government's fault. Those that did those crimes have been/are/will be prosecuted. We ARE the good guys.
Actually, it hasn't been determined that it was an accident. In fact, despite the fact that once again, you would convict the military like John Murtha without even an investigation or trial, they are just allegations. In fact, you've done this before. Remember? And when it was discovered that the allegations were false and incorrect, did you correct the post you started specifically to convict them with? No, you didn't. I corrected it for you. As I pointed out before, You have a different standard for convicting those that make your freedom possible and terrorists who seek to destroy your country. I'm sure *that's* just an accident
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/734126.html How come Arabs, even Israeli Arabs are so predictable!!! Regards, Dilip
He didn't have a reply for this one I guess. But I agree, if it's such a great place with such wonderful people, by all means, GTFO. They would cut your little penis off, shove it in your mouth and proceed to behead you. Yet, you argue for them. You're a terrorist cheerleader. You are a disgrace. Nobody says you have to like Bush, God knows I don't, but get fucking clue already man...THEY ARE TERRORISTS
You guys need to understand that all Israeli governments since 1967 have been progressively impotent, weak, insane and suicidal. Mark my words, it's only a matter of time before the impotents agree to "prisoner exchange deal" which will certainly lead to more Jews being murdered by released terrorists.
I've been trying to tell them that, even used you as an example (a good example) a week or so ago for exactly what you just said. I could not agree with you more! I don't care if someone doesn't like Bush, but BDS is no excuse for supporting and/or taking on the same positions as terrorists. It's no excuse for selling your country out. Then, of course, will come the "just because we disagree, we're labled terrorist supporters" cheerleaders. Ashamed of what they support, so they paint themselves as "progressive" victims. Bullhonkery! ly2 doesn't like Bush at all and has more than been vocal about it. But you don't see anyone calling him a terrorist supporter or selling out his country. I wonder why? Because there is a difference in disliking Bush and supporting terrorists and selling out your country. ly2's post is the perfect example of what I've been saying the past few weeks. It's ok to dislike and disagree with Bush. But using that hatred to justify taking on the positions of our enemies is disgraceful.
Probably because he's shown multiple times the desire to mass murder everyone in the middle east, to mass murder muslim women and children. Probably because he has no sympathy for the innocent people being raped and murdered by the US Army... that's why you like him so much
I haven't seen any such thing. Though I recall zarqawi doing those things and you never had any sympathy for those he murdered. In fact, in an altered state of reality, you gave his credit to US soldiers too. I've seen your support for Hamas and other terrorists who wish to do the same with Israel and the US. And of course, when *allegations* are made against troops, you're the first one behind the democrats (John Murtha, John Kerry) and al jazeera to convict them without a trial. And also the first one to demand a trial for terrorists. Admirable standards you have there
According to your theory, the white house should give Texas back to Mexico. Now change your theory so you dont look like a clown.
You signed up on the forum to make a reply to little ol' me! I'm flattered that you seek my attention! I've had a number of people whose purpose to sign up on the forum was to reply to me. Welcome to my club! You can sure try to give Mexico back, but I don't think it's going to happen. Besides, who took Mexico from whom? Israel was Israel long before islam was invented and long before Mexico was Mexico, bozo Absorbed with appearances, eh? Do you often change your theories so you won't look bad in the eyes of others, based on popular fads and fashions of the day? Thanks for the offer, but I'm not a liberal.
Funny a 5 minute search brings up his hatred for not only muslims, but mexicans as well: The list keeps going but I think that's enough to prove my point
Im not new, I was here more than a year ago but I lost my email/password. I use to visit this board and laugh and the fascist-christian-republicans.
You were gone for a lot more than five minutes. Perhaps you had to consult with hamas first? But alas, your red herring has no foundation, as I clearly noted above that even though he hates Bush, he doesn't support terrorists. Apparently that is a novel concept to you; novel enough that you had find another way to attack him to cover up for your own shortfalls when it comes to supporting terrorists.
Sure, and I was Betty Crocker's houseboy! Liberals don't seem to be able to keep up with important stuff like security (passwords). Don't forget nazi! Oh, and don't forget to change your theories to what is popular today. Wouldn't want anyone to think you were a clown
Perhaps I do more than just read this forum all day No red herrings.. was just replying to your question:
It was already answered: Because there is a difference in disliking Bush and supporting terrorists and selling out your country. As I eluded to, you can't see the difference though. What a surprise!
I couldn't tell ya, I don't suffer from BDS. I'm pretty sure Bush isn't worried about your support for hamas or selling your country out though. After all, you are no one of significant importance