Yo-Yo you seem to be somesort of fan to terrorist organisations and your anti-religious view. I would advise a mod here to ban him for inciting trouble.
Bwahahahahahahaha!!!! You've been here a month and now your advising the mods, brilliant! Maybe you should run for president
Yo-Yo face the fact.You are an anti-semitic,anti-christian,pro-islamic terrorist neo-nazi hippy who uses distorted facts given to you by the free palesteine foundation and the green party. You have a dangerous opinion and try to back it up with recently edited articles on wikipedia. I would advise all users to boycott this individual
You wouldn't be from the right-winger's society of crackpots would you? Did Gtech invite you in? I'm not anti-semitic.. in fact my 2 favorite TV shows have Jewish men as the main actors. I'm also not "pro islamic"... I'm not "pro" any group of people or religion. I'm pro-science, pro-choice, and pro-freedom.
As I've said before, terrorism in Palestine didn't start because of the creation process of Israel. The terrorism there was much more fierce then than it is today. So your argument that it is because of Israels action looks kind of funny since terrorism was there a long time before. The fact that you have started to immitate Anthonyceas habit in making sources to searches doesn't make your post less crazy.
I think you obviously are a pro-atheist, pro-conspiraist, pro-scientist and so on.. so your statement is invalid.
No, im against all terrorism, wether it comes from muslims, arabs, the US government, african warlords, christians boming abortion clinics, the FBI bombing the WTC, you, or anyone else. The difference is I'm not blind to the fact that things work both ways. It's not one side that is some great holy savior of the planet and the other side worships satan and hates everyone. The world is made up of many different groups of people... all which seem to have no regard to the others, all of which seem to only care about themselves, all which could care less who they trample over to get what they want.
What I don't get, though, is why you don't support the forces trying to get RID of terrorism. From that I conclude you are pro-terrorist, as you want them to live on. (*Refers to avatar, recent comments, and general attitude*)
What's your solution to getting rid of terrorism? Storming into a bunch of countries and blowing things up? Do you honestly believe that's going to just magically get rid of "terrorism"? Are you really that simple minded? How you fail to grasp the concept that: MURDERING OTHER PEOPLE'S FAMILIES AND RAPING THIER WOMEN IS GOING TO CREATE NEW HATRED AND NEW TERRORISTS is beyond me... it's common sense. The Iraq war IS BREEDING MORE terrorists. You can't just "get rid" of terrorism without getting rid of what causes people to become terrorists and commit terrorism. What happens when you discover that part of the cause is America's actions abroad, and every single person who pays taxes that paid for the bombs that killed those Iraqi's families? The entire point is... violence and wars aren't going to solve the problem, they're a catalyst and fuel to keep it going. That's why I'm not supporting it
This is why al qaida flew planes into the world trade center. Because we were in Iraq. Doesn't everyone know this? This is why the USS Cole was attacked, embassies were attacked, the WTC in the early 90s. All because we were in Iraq
Um, going to war against them, scanning financial transactions, monitoring phone calls (of suspected terrorists), receiving tips, scattering them, and some other things which I can't think of off the top of my head right now. You make it sound a lot more careless than it really is. Are you really this narrow-minded?? Hey, I never said that wouldn't happen. It happens very rarely; terrorist attacks are much more common. "Breeding terrorists" takes several years, you know. The kids have to grow up then be trained in the organization. If we continue to scatter them, bomb them, attack them, hunt them down and track them, we can eventually win this war. But people like you just sit here complaining about it and it doesn't help us win this war. Correction: LIBERAL America's actions abroad. I don't see any conservatives whining about this war, or trying to tear it down, or demoralizing the citizens. You have a better solution, Einstein?
Yeh!!!! Sweet!!! You got it all figured out!!! Maybe we can get national ID cards, RFID Chips and eye scanners too! That will surely solve all the problems! How many more civilians (50,000+) have to be murdered, how many more have to be raped, before you consider it as careless as it really is? Yes, I do. Don't start unneccessary wars, don't meddle in other country's business, don't fund occupying forces, don't train osama bin laden's and arm them, don't send saddam biological weapons and then turn your back on him, and deffinently don't elect crazy cowboys as the leader of the country.... you know... that kind of stuff would be a good start
You know, in WW2 and even into Vietnam and Korea War times, bombs were primarily dropped with hopes that it would hit the general vicinity of the target. Now, we have bombs that can hit a house, and a room in that house, and a corner in that room. How much more careless do you want us to get? Unnecessary wars? You have yet to tell me how this war is not helping the fight against terrorism/evil. You need to realize that what happens to one country may affect another country. What do you mean, "Don't fund occupying forces"??? You are incorrect: We did NOT send Saddam biological weapons. We sent him WEAPONS to fight off the Iranians, who we knew were becoming dangerous when a terrorist came to power there. He made his own biological weapons. Wait a minute, I thought Iraq didn't have WMDs? :O Guess they do now, since you just admitted they did, and we didn't give it to them. George W. Bush is not a crazy cowboy.
You're right about that... they certainly have hit plenty of houses.... A bomb that killed six civilians Monday near Baiji, Iraq, missed its target by 65 feet (20 meters) and hit the wrong home, military officials said. Really???? Records Show US Sent Biological Weapons Germs to Iraq It took me 10 seconds to prove you wrong on both points. All you have to do is learn how to do a little research and read before you start stating incorrect and false information.
What the mainstream media doesn't tell you is the thousands of bombs that DO hit their targets and kill few, if any at all, civilians, unlike hundreds before. That source is an extremely liberally-biased source of information, which is one reason you found it so fast. I refuse to believe that twisted information.
Yeh.. just a few... just 50,000 It was written by the AP..... How about this one: http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2002-09-30-iraq-ushelp_x.htm Wake up kid... America isn't as innocent as the government or republicans would have you believe
What baffles me is that durning world war 2, it's debateable whether or not the US would/could have won against Germany or Japan, if they had not carpet-bombed major cities. And today we're so politically correct when it comes to war, and granted I think it's somewhat a good thing. But when it comes down to it, war is war, and this PC bullshit doesn't cut it. Japan and Germany didn't give us any quarter, and they damn sure didn't give a shit that there was civilians there or not. So there's your idealistic view in war, and there's reality. Reality is there are no rules, and don't expect a nuke bearing terrorist to read the geneva convention when/if they ever blow up a nuke near you. I'm not raging warmonger, but it's the difference between being realistic and practical that we have to assume civilian casulties in any conflict. I believe we should practice certain principlese within war (that constitute humanity), but I don't think we should make war a PC adventure. It's ugly, and it will always be. But when it comes down to it, would you have made our past world war different because of your idealism? If so, please move away from politics.
If this was WW2, by this time at the war, it'd be a few million, like it was back in the '40s. How pessimistic of you. And I don't get why you liberals are still complaining about it after all these years... Ooo... how intimidating.
This isn't world war 2 Probably because idiot republicans are using it as a reason to attack Iraq.... first you send them biological weapons from Bush 1, then you attack them for having weapons with Bush 2.... and then you wonder why the rest of the world hates you