Actually when one says the train has left the station one means what is already a fait accompli, something that has already happened. ISrael already has nuclear capacity.
I know what does it mean. I mean nuclear weapons in the region is not ok. israel has to destroy nucelar weapons, it is not late for destroying.
so did Iraq as USA once said, "Iraq had weapons of mass destruction", even less destructive than nuclear, the train was left if we were to believe what USA said that time, despite the train left (again assuming that USA is too innocent and really believed Iraq has WMD's) USA launched war against Iraq, not saying that they should launch war against Israel, but maybe at least to show some honesty and say, they are against their WMD's.
Once a country acquires Nukes, it will keep them forever, in some form or the other. Thats why Israel will always have them, but would prevent others from having them.
great idea. let them fry our troops in iraq and afganestan. in the mean time i am paying more for gas
Israel is going over-board in using bullied language against the Iran.....removing Iran from the face of the planet is utter bullshit....politicians must restrict themselves from using foul and irresponsible language.....they are the realones to blame for real life global problems
Again some one left me a gray calling me dumb for saying that dropping nuke on Iran would result in major issues for our troops . If not in immediate death certainly in health issues for years to come. I wonder who is stupid. The people that suggest things like that or the ones that recognize the result of these stupid actions and suggestion, and oppose it.
So if Iran was attacking Israel, they should not respond & nobody else has the right to think Israel should & must respond?