Israel and Syria officially confirm indirect talks

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by iggysick, May 21, 2008.

  1. imad

    imad Peon

    Messages:
    2,321
    Likes Received:
    41
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #101
    we can argue about Mashaal, but this does not mean that Israel did not violate the treaty ;)
     
    imad, May 26, 2008 IP
  2. Lemon116

    Lemon116 Active Member

    Messages:
    1,245
    Likes Received:
    38
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #102
    Israel did, doesnt mean you should.
    Talking about 1997 wont benifit you much, focus on the future instead. Think one step forward and not back.

    There are peace agreements with Egypt and Jordan. Next is Syria, Lebanon and so on...

    By 2029 The world should be a better place.
    It can happen with one condition only: Iran has no nuclear weapon.

    The only thing left to do is pray.
     
    Lemon116, May 26, 2008 IP
  3. imad

    imad Peon

    Messages:
    2,321
    Likes Received:
    41
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #103
    so you were serious!

    call that number, find somebody who can speak the language.

    yeah I heard this before, the only obstacle is Iran now.
     
    imad, May 26, 2008 IP
  4. Lemon116

    Lemon116 Active Member

    Messages:
    1,245
    Likes Received:
    38
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #104
    Sadly that seems to be Islam’s answer to everything.
     
    Lemon116, May 26, 2008 IP
  5. iggysick

    iggysick Guest

    Messages:
    2,781
    Likes Received:
    64
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #105
    As usual... But I guess that's the Israeli way...
     
    iggysick, May 26, 2008 IP
  6. Ohad

    Ohad Guest

    Messages:
    622
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #106
    why the Palestinians should have the right on the land?
     
    Ohad, May 26, 2008 IP
  7. iggysick

    iggysick Guest

    Messages:
    2,781
    Likes Received:
    64
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #107
    why should you have right to that land? Because once in history you owned that land? Are you the only one that have that right or we should now redraw map of whole world? You know, for each piece of land we could find someone that owned it in past but now belongs to someone else. History of whole world is full of wars and changing borders by wars.
     
    iggysick, May 26, 2008 IP
  8. Ohad

    Ohad Guest

    Messages:
    622
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #108
    OK, so what is the problem? anybody doesn't have the right on the land as you say, so why do we occupying? it's not their land as you said..
     
    Ohad, May 26, 2008 IP
  9. imad

    imad Peon

    Messages:
    2,321
    Likes Received:
    41
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #109
    in fact this is the Israeli answer which I used, I remember when Arafat was the only obstacle, and after him Hamas, and now Iran, each period of time, there is an "only" obstacle in Israel "struggle for peace", none of these are the settlements, or the occupation of other people's land.
     
    imad, May 26, 2008 IP
  10. imad

    imad Peon

    Messages:
    2,321
    Likes Received:
    41
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #110
    there is a problem here, when history proves that Jewish people were there 2000 years ago, then they have the right, but when history proves that Arabs been there before them, then nobody have a right?

    Islam came after Judaism, and after Christianity, at some period of time, there was only Jews and Christians and no Muslims, using your logic, then Jewish should take over all Christian and Muslim countries, regardless if the people of these countries, decided to become Muslims or Christians, from Judaism or Paganism or else,

    using the same logic too, if suddenly all people of France became Muslims, this gives the right to Britain to occupy France, does not make sense for me.
     
    imad, May 26, 2008 IP
  11. ziya

    ziya Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,971
    Likes Received:
    28
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #111
    Olmert says Israel hasn't offered Golan. olmert is not brave enaugh to make historical decision
     
    ziya, May 26, 2008 IP
  12. Ichigo91

    Ichigo91 Guest

    Messages:
    948
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #112
    Well its not like giving the Golan back will stop this war. the arabs would be bored (not personally)
     
    Ichigo91, May 26, 2008 IP
  13. pizzaman

    pizzaman Active Member

    Messages:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    52
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #113
    israel has peace with both egypt and jordan. what makes you say what you say?
     
    pizzaman, May 26, 2008 IP
  14. Lemon116

    Lemon116 Active Member

    Messages:
    1,245
    Likes Received:
    38
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #114
    Anyone who uses his muscles instead of his brain should be on the list you mentioned.
    Yes, that includes hamas, iran, hizbollah and other "peaceful" organizations.

    Thinking one step forward Ill mention that Israel uses both, in the best combination.

    No wonder Israel is in its best while all of the above are hiding in their bunkers seeing no daylight and breathing ventilation air :D
     
    Lemon116, May 26, 2008 IP
  15. pizzaman

    pizzaman Active Member

    Messages:
    4,053
    Likes Received:
    52
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #115
    i think there is a big margin of both palestanian and israelis that feel, there is no hope for peace. the challenge is to make them believe and act to promote peace.
    the ones that genuinely oppose it will win or lose depending the outcome.
     
    pizzaman, May 26, 2008 IP
  16. imad

    imad Peon

    Messages:
    2,321
    Likes Received:
    41
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #116
    exactly, so it should include Israel from the beginning, but it does not, its always that Israel is the hero, and the victim at the same time, before they start treating symptoms, they should first treat the cause.
     
    imad, May 26, 2008 IP
  17. iggysick

    iggysick Guest

    Messages:
    2,781
    Likes Received:
    64
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #117
    The problem is that zionist didn't wanted to share land from the very begining and they took ALL of land by force expelling 700,000 Palestinians from their villages and towns and erasing those same villages and towns or filling them with Jewish imigrants from all over the world. Of course, when you expell 700,000 people from their homes there's a great chance that some of them will fight back wanting to destroy what caused their exodus. I know I would wish that.
    All the BS fairy tales how they want to kill you only because you're Jews can only be sold to 60% of US citizens.
    Once when you decide to share land peace will come. Not the same day but it will come. Until then you will fight but as I can see according to your posts you can't wait a day to join the fighting so there's another reason for endless war there...
     
    iggysick, May 26, 2008 IP
  18. Lemon116

    Lemon116 Active Member

    Messages:
    1,245
    Likes Received:
    38
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #118
    Haha... Dont make stupid claims, its just ridiculous :eek:

    http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=858699

    Your brain was washed :rolleyes:
     
    Lemon116, May 26, 2008 IP
  19. ThraXed

    ThraXed Peon

    Messages:
    1,794
    Likes Received:
    56
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #119
    ThraXed, May 27, 2008 IP
  20. Lemon116

    Lemon116 Active Member

    Messages:
    1,245
    Likes Received:
    38
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #120
    Lemon116, May 27, 2008 IP
    Blogmaster likes this.