Israel and Syria officially confirm indirect talks

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by iggysick, May 21, 2008.

  1. #1
    Israel and Syria officially confirm indirect talks

    Is there any chance that Israel will return stolen land? I don't think so but there's always a hope for that.
     
    iggysick, May 21, 2008 IP
  2. Ichigo91

    Ichigo91 Guest

    Messages:
    948
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Israel is not stolen land, go side with the terrorists.
     
    Ichigo91, May 21, 2008 IP
  3. iggysick

    iggysick Guest

    Messages:
    2,781
    Likes Received:
    64
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Israel did stole the land and keep stealing it. Go side with thieves.
     
    iggysick, May 21, 2008 IP
  4. Rebecca

    Rebecca Prominent Member

    Messages:
    5,458
    Likes Received:
    349
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    325
    Articles:
    14
    #4
    lol I agree with you, but be careful, in this section there are a bunch of Israel haters.
     
    Rebecca, May 21, 2008 IP
  5. ziya

    ziya Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,971
    Likes Received:
    28
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #5
    Israel stolen the land. And Israel has to leave land. Lets what will happen in future :)

    Marie Okabe ( UN) is thanksfull to Turkey for helping to get peace
     
    ziya, May 21, 2008 IP
  6. earlpearl

    earlpearl Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,584
    Likes Received:
    150
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #6
    A successful peace effort doesn't start out with the concept that A stole B's land or any other kind of accusation. The party's start looking for ways to agree.

    Start finding where there are areas of mutual interest. Both sides will want peace. If there is enough momentum and agreement on the concepts that both sides can agree upon then possibly the areas where they disagree will be overcome.

    Its a tough process. I have negotiated hundreds, possibly over 1,000 business agreements. Many of them start out with lots of areas where the parties disagree. Try and find where the parties agree....that is always a key. See if there is enough energy and will to emphasize the purpose for the talks in the first place over the problems and issues that have gotten in the way.

    We will see what happens over time.
     
    earlpearl, May 21, 2008 IP
  7. Divisive Cottonwood

    Divisive Cottonwood Peon

    Messages:
    1,674
    Likes Received:
    35
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    It's long be widely recognised amongst Israelis that the price for peace with Syria would be the return of the Golan Heights... just as the price for peace with Egypt was the return of the Negev... it was just matter of when rather than if...
     
    Divisive Cottonwood, May 21, 2008 IP
  8. iggysick

    iggysick Guest

    Messages:
    2,781
    Likes Received:
    64
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Of course, what can you expect from someone who supports using WMD against enemy civilians other than supporting stealing someone else's land.
     
    iggysick, May 21, 2008 IP
  9. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #9
    Actually, I believe Rebecca's position was that she would kill innocent civilians to protect her family.

    I don't think WMDs were required, just the hypocrisy of someone who wants to tell 14 year olds that they can't have sex, but willing to murder those same 14 year olds for their own survival.
     
    guerilla, May 21, 2008 IP
  10. LeoSeo

    LeoSeo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,647
    Likes Received:
    56
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    125
    #10
    Promising step forwards. Settling with Syria could be a major progress for Israel, as Syria is in someway related with pretty much everything about Israel's issues, and vica versa.
     
    LeoSeo, May 21, 2008 IP
  11. ziya

    ziya Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,971
    Likes Received:
    28
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #11
    Will it be easy for Olmert step back , and agree to leave land ? Olmert has problem with corruption cases, this can end his rule
     
    ziya, May 21, 2008 IP
  12. Rankhyips

    Rankhyips Banned

    Messages:
    233
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    Not only is it stolen land, they used to have a PM (Golda Meir) who had the audacity to say: "There is not such a thing as a Palestinian".
    Zionism is the worst form of racism. It's fascism, apartheid and supremacy, all in one. It's organized crime at the top levels. They milk countries dry to pay for their fake country, they force a generation that has nothing to do with WWII to pay for a fake event that eventually lead (it was "calculated") to steal land legally.
    I, for one, will never recognize the state of Israel. It's still Palestina in my mind. (P.S.: When you type "Palestina", Google will mark it as a spelling mistake, as if it doesn't exist!)
    It's your best weapon against Zionism. You openly declare you don't recognize it, as much as you can.
     
    Rankhyips, May 21, 2008 IP
  13. Rebecca

    Rebecca Prominent Member

    Messages:
    5,458
    Likes Received:
    349
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    325
    Articles:
    14
    #13
    I am glad to know that you guys are paying attention. Yes I do:
    1. Support Israel.
    2. Would use WMD if I had to, to protect my family.
    3. believe having sex with children and child porn should stay illegal, even though Guerilla would like to legalize it.

    Thanks!:)
     
    Rebecca, May 21, 2008 IP
  14. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #14
    I believe you said you would kill innocent people, isn't that right Rebecca?

    I find it interesting that you have a greater aversion to porn than you do to murder.

    Making child porn illegal doesn't stop it. I mean, there are laws against murder, and you've already admitted that you would commit murder if it was in your interest, regardless of any consequences or morality.

    In a way, your willingness to kill despite the moral and legal prohibitions against it, is probably similar to the willingness that drives people to ignore morality and law to produce child porn.
     
    guerilla, May 21, 2008 IP
  15. LogicFlux

    LogicFlux Peon

    Messages:
    2,925
    Likes Received:
    102
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    Appeasers!!!
     
    LogicFlux, May 21, 2008 IP
  16. iggysick

    iggysick Guest

    Messages:
    2,781
    Likes Received:
    64
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    My daughter is a year and month old and I dunno how Rebecca would stop me in killing of her family if she nukes my baby girl (hypoteticaly speaking)

    You clearly said that you would kill innocent civilians using WMD to protect you and your family. Should we than be suprised because there's so many innocent Palestinians civilians got murdered each year? You know, IOF only protecting their families...
     
    iggysick, May 21, 2008 IP
  17. Rebecca

    Rebecca Prominent Member

    Messages:
    5,458
    Likes Received:
    349
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    325
    Articles:
    14
    #17
    To repeat: Yes, I have a great aversion to porn, when it involves having children star in it. Yes, I would support using WMD if I had to, in order to protect my family.



    Iggysick, I think you are just angry with me because I stated I support Israel, isn't that what this is all about? That is why I think your pulling out the WMD thread. I even stated in that thread that I didn't believe it was right to use it on Japan. WMD are a very last resort. But if I was backed in a corner with an aggressor, and I had to choose between protecting myself, or letting them kill my family, I would protect my family. Do not bring this on a personal level and say I would want to hurt your daughter or that you would kill my family.
     
    Rebecca, May 21, 2008 IP
  18. iggysick

    iggysick Guest

    Messages:
    2,781
    Likes Received:
    64
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    When you support killing innocent civilians to protect your ass it's no wonder that you support land grab and stealing. It has nothing to do with supporting Israel. This thread is about occupied land by Israel (which is main obstacle for peace between Israel and Syria). Occupied=stolen.
    The problem with you is that you would use WMD but you wouldn't hurt my daughter how? You would nuke whole city but my house will be spared? I just want to show you how irrational your statement is.
    WMD kills everyone on some area including kids and would kill my daughter too and I see big problem in killing innocent kids no matter who are their fathers.
     
    iggysick, May 21, 2008 IP
  19. browntwn

    browntwn Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    8,347
    Likes Received:
    848
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    435
    #19
    Frankly, guys like guerilla, swaymedia, and Rankhyips get all riled up whenever anyone supports Israel. It is pretty funny to see guerilla try to sound rational while at the same time trying to support swaymedia all over DP.

    I would not trust the defense of my country, my family, or even a pet to people like guerilla. He is more offended that we are off the gold standard than by kids being raped. That says all one needs to know about the man.
     
    browntwn, May 21, 2008 IP
  20. guerilla

    guerilla Notable Member

    Messages:
    9,066
    Likes Received:
    262
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    200
    #20
    I never posted about supporting Israel to this thread. I just found the post by iggy appropriate, because Rebecca has inferred that I support rape, and up until now, I had let her slide on her belief that mass murder of civilians could be justifiable under any circumstance.

    This is a funny Ad Hominem attack. Not only is it untrue, but it is silly on it's face. You must be getting desperate. :D
     
    guerilla, May 21, 2008 IP