Actually, the word used in Isiah is ha-almah which means young woman. It is not the same as the word for virgin. The specific word for virgin is bethulah. If they meant virgin in the way you use it, why did they not use the word for virgin? As for God not being jealous in the Christian view, note taht I am talking about the jealousy of His chosen people. Only the Old Testament makes mention of this (though I will grant that the New Testament does still refer to his jealousy of other gods, but that is not what I was talking about and should have made clearer). The new Testament certainly does make references to this changing. The biggest and most obvious is that God supposedly changed his mind about favoring the chosen people (the Jews) and gave salvation to all people equally. He was jealous of His chosen people in the Old Testament. In the New Testament he lumps them together with the rest of the world. I'd say that is a paradigm shift. Christians think they believe in one God, but Jews view the Christian faith as believing in multiple Gods. The Jewish view of the Tanakh does not allow for the physical manifestation of God as a man that is seperate yet the same as God. If a Jew were to believe that it would be akin to heresy. Not the same. Again, you say where does it say that in the Old Testament, but the Old Testament is not the same as the Tanakh. You failed to even address that. Until you do, this question has no relevance. But since you asked, it is referred to in Leviticus 23:24-32 and again in Ezekiel 40:1. As for Psalm 22, the link you give shows the verse from only one of the various Hebrew texts (the Masoretic). First, the words "they maul" are not actually in the literal translation, they are interpreted to be there (hence the paranthesis). Second, to maul something is to beat, bruise, mangle, or handle roughly. That is hardly the same as poecing which is to penetrate, run through or to stab. As far as the Dead Sea Scrolls, again, they do not concur with the King James version. Digging and piecing are two different actions. Beyond that, I only listed two of the mistranslations. In the King James version there are about 2000 with close to 500 changing the meaning of the passage (the rest being synonym changes). That hardly make the Old Testament the same as the Tanakh. Let's see what you just neglected to try to counter at all. The missing Oral Torah. The concept of satan/Satan and hell. Original sin. Salvation. Yeah, those very fundamental differences of core beliefs make Christianity and Judaism exactly the same. You'll have to work a lot harder than that to even come close.
And the discussion has ended. Please come back when you have actually compared them. When an animal mauls you they pierce you with their teeth or claws. Try again. So the Jewish God is suddenly not all powerful? He can appear as a pillar of smoke and fire and in a bush but he can't appear as a man. What Jews are you talking to? In today's society young woman doesn't imply virgin. Back then if you were a young unmarried woman and not a virgin you were a whore. So if the Messiah was to be born of a whore why didn't they use the specific word for "whore?" We are at an impass.