Is what I am doing legal?

Discussion in 'Legal Issues' started by WeedGrinch, Feb 1, 2008.

  1. #1
    Ok I've been copying an article (in its full) and the URL where I found it, and blogging it. I had someone leave a comment saying that even though I linked to the original article I still cannot do it.
     
    WeedGrinch, Feb 1, 2008 IP
  2. j00

    j00 Guest

    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    I wouldn't think you would be allowed.
     
    j00, Feb 1, 2008 IP
  3. WeedGrinch

    WeedGrinch Active Member

    Messages:
    1,236
    Likes Received:
    73
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #3
    I'm putting a link to where I got it.
     
    WeedGrinch, Feb 1, 2008 IP
  4. starterman

    starterman Peon

    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    can u hand in a school report, copied from a dictionary, and write at the bottom u got it from there?
     
    starterman, Feb 1, 2008 IP
  5. WeedGrinch

    WeedGrinch Active Member

    Messages:
    1,236
    Likes Received:
    73
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #5
    Yea. As long as you cite your source.
     
    WeedGrinch, Feb 1, 2008 IP
  6. bluegrass special

    bluegrass special Peon

    Messages:
    790
    Likes Received:
    50
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    No, actually you can't. You can take a small quote and cite it. You can discuss the contents of the article. But to reproduce it (and putting it on your website is reproducing it) without permission from the copyright holder is infringement and illegal. A link back to the source is not a replacement for permission.
     
    bluegrass special, Feb 1, 2008 IP
    WeedGrinch likes this.
  7. kbarry838

    kbarry838 Peon

    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    It depends on where you took it from. Some places allow the copying of the articles.
     
    kbarry838, Feb 1, 2008 IP
  8. WeedGrinch

    WeedGrinch Active Member

    Messages:
    1,236
    Likes Received:
    73
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #8
    Ok thanks, from now on, I will only blog "chunks" of an article
     
    WeedGrinch, Feb 1, 2008 IP
  9. bluegrass special

    bluegrass special Peon

    Messages:
    790
    Likes Received:
    50
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    Those places are few and far between (Wikipedia is one). That is only true of places that specifically state that they allow it.
     
    bluegrass special, Feb 1, 2008 IP
  10. moneydude

    moneydude Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,022
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    130
    #10
    like few months ago i did doing same thing, copying content from pages which allow it ... its not wroth it. Google and other engines don't like blogs/pages with copy/past content ... They may iwn ban u from adsense, i rly dont advice u to keep doing this =)
     
    moneydude, Feb 1, 2008 IP
  11. bluegrass special

    bluegrass special Peon

    Messages:
    790
    Likes Received:
    50
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11

    That may constitute infringement as well. Copying a substantial portion is considered infringement as well. Substantial is not a predefined amout, it is a subjective measure. A paragraph can be considered substantial.
     
    bluegrass special, Feb 1, 2008 IP
  12. WeedGrinch

    WeedGrinch Active Member

    Messages:
    1,236
    Likes Received:
    73
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #12
    If that was true, digg.com wouldn't be here.
     
    WeedGrinch, Feb 1, 2008 IP
  13. bluegrass special

    bluegrass special Peon

    Messages:
    790
    Likes Received:
    50
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    If you think it is not true then you should do a little research. Digg survives for several reasons. One, most of the articles that are submitted are submitted by the authors of the article, when they post it on Digg they are giving permission to use it (Digg doesn't go out and copy it). Two, Digg content is submitted by users which gives the site way more protection from infringement claims than you would have by copying articles. Three, copyright owners can choose when to enforce. If somebody copies a paragraph from somebody else's article but points the Digg article to the original article then the copyright holder may see that as free advertising (because Digg is well known). They may view you in a different light, and they are within their rights to do so.
     
    bluegrass special, Feb 1, 2008 IP
  14. jhn2001

    jhn2001 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,707
    Likes Received:
    46
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #14
    you can always keep copying the articles ! I dont believe in copyright and stuff when it comes to copying content !
     
    jhn2001, Feb 1, 2008 IP
  15. bluegrass special

    bluegrass special Peon

    Messages:
    790
    Likes Received:
    50
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    You can believe what you want, but the law isn't predicated on your beliefs.
     
    bluegrass special, Feb 1, 2008 IP
  16. jhn2001

    jhn2001 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,707
    Likes Received:
    46
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #16
    You can believe what you want, but the law isn't predicated on your beliefs.


    Look I copied the lines which you typed........! please dont sue me now :eek:

    Lmao !
     
    jhn2001, Feb 1, 2008 IP
  17. YouTubeDude

    YouTubeDude Peon

    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #17
    Its not legal but most of the time they give a shit about it...
     
    YouTubeDude, Feb 1, 2008 IP
  18. WeedGrinch

    WeedGrinch Active Member

    Messages:
    1,236
    Likes Received:
    73
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #18
    Can whoever just gave me red rep for this post at least tell me who they are instead of being a fu**ing pu**y
     
    WeedGrinch, Feb 1, 2008 IP
  19. bluegrass special

    bluegrass special Peon

    Messages:
    790
    Likes Received:
    50
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19

    No, it is not. It is predicated on the actual law. You said you don't believe in copyright when it comes to content. What exactly do you think copyright is for? Just because you don't want the law to apply to you doesn't mean it doesn't. Try that argument with a judge and see how it works for you.

    As far as you copying my one line. A sentence is generally not enough to copyright. Also, when I became a member I agreed to the ToS which gives the forum certain rights to use any of my posts (which includes allowing others to quote my post). All that sentence does is show your lack of understanding of copyright law.

    I am actually fairly well versed in copyright law. You could use a brush-up on it. If you're in the US I suggest checking out www.copyright.gov

    @Weed - I suspect it is the same person that left one for me.
     
    bluegrass special, Feb 1, 2008 IP
    walkere likes this.
  20. The Emirates Gallastico

    The Emirates Gallastico Banned

    Messages:
    4,639
    Likes Received:
    182
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    You, sire, are a dumbass.

    Thank you. :)