1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Is this rank fake?

Discussion in 'Google' started by RJP1, Apr 13, 2010.

0
Page 1 of 2
  1. #1
    RJP1, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  2. nolag

    nolag Member

    Messages:
    201
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    28
    #2
    prchecker.com it will do all you need. I think that the site is not the /whatever just the domain.
     
    nolag, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  3. mzonas

    mzonas Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    721
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    160
    #3
    The whole page seems to be PR7. The domain is PR9 and valid so it is normal that pages are PR7 or even PR8.
     
    mzonas, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  4. Azzaboi

    Azzaboi Peon

    Messages:
    90
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    IITK - Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur

    It says http://www.iitk.ac.in/ has a page rank of 9 and it's ...
    DMOZ.org listed
    Google Directory listed
    Yahoo! Directory listed

    so it's not faked, links inside will probably also be quite high. How it got away with the random links on the bottom-right, beats me!
     
    Azzaboi, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  5. Sxperm

    Sxperm Notable Member

    Messages:
    4,386
    Likes Received:
    142
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    225
    #5
    This site has a strange PR somehow

    www.iitk.ac.in/ime/MBA_IITK/avantgarde/ - PR7
    iitk.ac.in/ime/MBA_IITK/avantgarde/ - PR1

    You can check by insert the url with this PR checker tools - here. Choose second option for checking URL.

    P.S. I do not think this one is fake from having different PR for the two versions. This is a bad practice of link managment from the beginning. It should be selected one version - www / non-www and build links toward only one version to prevent PR splitted like this. It can still be fixed by do 301 redirect from one version to another version.
     
    Sxperm, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  6. Brandon Sheley

    Brandon Sheley Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    9,721
    Likes Received:
    612
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    420
    #6
    that site didn't produce the correct PR for two sites I checked
     
    Brandon Sheley, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  7. checkblog

    checkblog Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,212
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    128
    #7
    checkblog, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  8. Woochy

    Woochy Peon

    Messages:
    90
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Its probably a student who tried to make some sales for quick money.

    I reported it to the institute management, I guess he gonna get kicked.
     
    Woochy, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  9. eldiablo

    eldiablo Active Member

    Messages:
    200
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    80
    #9
    I've got PR 0 for your page...
    I'm using google toolbar... Then I've checked again it was PR 7...
    Then again PR 0... Very strange... I happens to me only when google update is "on", but it isn't at the moment.

    It should be real PR as it seems to be DMOZ listed Google listed and Yahoo! listed but google toolbar seems to be quite confusing when it comes to this certain url...

    Hope it helps. :)
     
    eldiablo, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  10. WJNemesis

    WJNemesis Guest

    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    Two Pr's on a site, wow didn't know that could happen :D
     
    WJNemesis, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  11. frankelectronics

    frankelectronics Guest

    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    He'll get banned.
     
    frankelectronics, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  12. mchrest

    mchrest Active Member

    Messages:
    465
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #12
    it is definite black hat crap seo
     
    mchrest, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  13. weng

    weng Peon

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    I think it is true PR7. I get PR 7 in my toolbar.
     
    weng, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  14. microman007

    microman007 Peon

    Messages:
    317
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    I am not sure. I check it, it is PR 7. but the website seems to not good enough. just wait and see google will do what
     
    microman007, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  15. China_girl

    China_girl Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,096
    Likes Received:
    72
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    195
    #15
    Check on this site checkpagerank.net
    I am sure the pages has a valid PR7
     
    China_girl, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  16. zoom

    zoom Peon

    Messages:
    1,244
    Likes Received:
    29
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    I think it is valid PR7.
     
    zoom, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  17. johagulo

    johagulo Peon

    Messages:
    879
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #17
    I don't think that it is fake, in fact I think it is quite accurate
     
    johagulo, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  18. SOULZRIPPER

    SOULZRIPPER Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,382
    Likes Received:
    39
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    165
    #18
    It is a real pagerank I checked it through Searchstatus plugin ;)
     
    SOULZRIPPER, Apr 13, 2010 IP
  19. zesmedia

    zesmedia Peon

    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    I think its not fake but true.
     
    zesmedia, May 6, 2010 IP
  20. sendmemessage

    sendmemessage Guest

    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    I also agree with the Zesmwdia, & want to share my point of view that it is neither faked nor baseless. There are logical & technical groundings which support it.
     
    sendmemessage, May 7, 2010 IP
Page 1 of 2