I have two domains which i think, will suit for a new hosting service.. hostingstarter.com - this is tooo long colneg.com - this mean nothing. but this is short.. what do you think. which is good or neither is good
Well, my first opinion would be neither domain is good. When client see your site atleast he should knows it is hosting site. However, if you dont have any option apart from these domains, then you can use first would be fine..
thing is all domains has been brought and, there is none left.... and all domains just left as it is...
First one isn't so long , why it is ? its not bad and good if you ever thought of SEO , from the name people would know its a hosting company , but they won't be able to know so of you use the other domain
I don't think that length is an issue. HostingStarter would be good. I think you should use HostingStarter unless you could get that other site to mean something involving hosting!
both names are good, but the send one looks short. It will be good for remember your website name for customers.
Hostingstarter is the better of the two, but it's still not great. And colneg? What is a colneg? That's just a bad domain name, unless your name is Colneg, and it's you personal site lol
HostingStarter.com is, from my perspective, vastly superior to your provided alternative. The quality of the services in which you decide to offer will greatly outweigh the mere length of the chosen domain name. Regardless of its length, the name has the potential to be successfully marketable in the future. 'ColNeg' (or colneg) reminds me of a matter that has absolutely no correlation to the objective of your proposed venture.
I recommend you use first domain name and just redirect another one to it. So both of them will be used