Is this considered duplicate content, or am I wrong?

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by KaiN889, May 31, 2008.

  1. #1
    I came across an established (6+ year) real estate site that ranks at the top of Google for nearly every major Colorado City (Boulder real estate, Parker real estate, and many other cities).

    What I don’t understand is each page for each city is the exact same including what little actual content there is in the sentences, except for the city name is appropriately changed.

    Example 1:

    http://www.cohomefinder.com/Boulder-real-estate-and-homes.htm
    http://www.cohomefinder.com/Parker-real-estate-and-homes.htm

    Example 2:

    http://www.cohomefinder.com/Boulder-listings.htm
    http://www.cohomefinder.com/Parker-listings.htm

    A few questions:

    1) Is this duplicate content, or am I wrong?

    2) With pages for each city +90% duplicated, and no “real” content, just listings, links and few sentences; how do they search so well for every city?

    3) How do they get by with no real content besides listings? How are they not being penalized?

    4) Home prices dynamically change, and new listings are updated every night through MLS/IDX feed, would this help offset rank even though everything else is duplicated?

    5) And, could I do something similar so I can quit writing lengthy "essays" for all 70+ cities just for the sake of having content?:D

    Thank you,

    KaiN
     
    KaiN889, May 31, 2008 IP
  2. Dan Schulz

    Dan Schulz Peon

    Messages:
    6,032
    Likes Received:
    437
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    1.) Yes, this is duplicate content.
    2.) They've cross-linked their Web site's pages and they have a crapload of links with their choice of anchor text pointing back to their Web site's respective pages.
    3.) They're definately trying to manipulate the search index - I'm surprised they haven't been caught yet. Why don't you file a spam report with Google and see what they say? (You can do this from your Google Webmasters Central account.)
    4.) If the content is available with JavaScript turned off, it possibly could. I don't see how it would though.
    5.) I strongly advise against doing something like that.
     
    Dan Schulz, May 31, 2008 IP