Is this considered Cloaking?

Discussion in 'Google' started by Yeldarb, Aug 2, 2007.

  1. #1
    I'm using cookies to determine whether or not I should show certain content to a user. But since googlebot doesn't (I presume) accept cookies, it won't ever see this content. But will see other content that users only see on their first visit.

    It's not my whole page, it's just an image that I only want first-time visitors to see. I then set a cookie so they don't see it again.

    But is this alright since I'm showing different content to googlebot and users?
     
    Yeldarb, Aug 2, 2007 IP
  2. rootbinbash

    rootbinbash Peon

    Messages:
    2,198
    Likes Received:
    88
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Indeed its not cloaking.Cloaking means ,serving different content to S.E and visitors.Since you are serving same content to first time visitors and S.E , its not cloaking.
     
    rootbinbash, Aug 2, 2007 IP
  3. oseymour

    oseymour Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,960
    Likes Received:
    92
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #3
    since its just an image then its not a problem...the spiders can read the image anyway
     
    oseymour, Aug 2, 2007 IP
  4. Agurus

    Agurus Active Member

    Messages:
    252
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    #4
    No I had a similiar senario, it is not cloaking
     
    Agurus, Aug 2, 2007 IP
  5. SEO Madrid

    SEO Madrid Peon

    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    I agree it's not cloaking. Actually, cloaking is not necessarily something forbidden. I use a user agent detection that identifies the Googlebot and removes the partner references from the URLs of my site just for the Bot but not for ther users, and that's ethical cloaking since it's done to avoid duplicate content (different URLs with the same content). I've been using it for over a year and my positions have improved as I got rid of a serious duplicate content issue.
     
    SEO Madrid, Aug 3, 2007 IP
  6. mizaks

    mizaks Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,066
    Likes Received:
    126
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #6
    This seems like an interesting concept -- how did you go about doing this?
     
    mizaks, Aug 3, 2007 IP
  7. SEO Madrid

    SEO Madrid Peon

    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    It's basically the logical way to avoid this kind of duplicate content, as each URL is considered a different webpage, and we had hundreds of different partner references, so we were suffering a serious problem of duplicate content. I've heard of other companies that make a 301 redirect for google in their cobrands and it works good for them as well.
     
    SEO Madrid, Aug 14, 2007 IP