Is this against TOS?

Discussion in 'Guidelines / Compliance' started by qwestcommunications, Jul 29, 2006.

  1. #1
    qwestcommunications, Jul 29, 2006 IP
  2. sebastya

    sebastya Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,449
    Likes Received:
    46
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    138
    #2
    there's already been a thread about this...
     
    sebastya, Jul 29, 2006 IP
  3. kayanush

    kayanush Guest

    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Hmmm nothing wrong with that..
     
    kayanush, Jul 29, 2006 IP
  4. Freddy81

    Freddy81 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    389
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    108
    #4
    Not, it's not a violation.
     
    Freddy81, Jul 29, 2006 IP
  5. csv

    csv Peon

    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    It's on the edge, but still on the safe side i think.
     
    csv, Jul 29, 2006 IP
  6. Tearabite

    Tearabite Prominent Member

    Messages:
    4,628
    Likes Received:
    429
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    300
    #6
    yep.. this has been posted before..

    If you've read and understand the TOS, you would KNOW that this is clearly a violation.. However, because the image is so cleaverly implemented, it MIGHT be argued that it's 'ok'. To me, that ruler in the kid's hand is no different than an arrow pointing to that ad, it does the same thing - giving unnatural attention to the ad (and it does it very well)
     
    Tearabite, Jul 29, 2006 IP
  7. pjk

    pjk Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    624
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #7
    I'd say it is fine.
     
    pjk, Jul 29, 2006 IP
  8. Tearabite

    Tearabite Prominent Member

    Messages:
    4,628
    Likes Received:
    429
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    300
    #8

    So.. "unnaturally" directing a reader's attention to an ad is fine?

    Please elaborate on your opinion to help me and some of the N00bs that might be reading understand why this is ok.. You know.. just so we all understand..
     
    Tearabite, Jul 29, 2006 IP
  9. adwordaffiliate

    adwordaffiliate Active Member

    Messages:
    760
    Likes Received:
    22
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #9
    Hard to say really, but personally I would say that a picture like that is almost crying out "click the ads, go on, you know you want to :p" but in a more indirect way.
     
    adwordaffiliate, Jul 29, 2006 IP
  10. Monty

    Monty Peon

    Messages:
    1,363
    Likes Received:
    132
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    I don't know if it's violate the TOS, but it's well done.
    I would try it on one of my site, but I would ask Google first, just to be sure.
     
    Monty, Jul 29, 2006 IP
  11. superclick

    superclick Peon

    Messages:
    369
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    Nicely done but I would say that it is against the TOS.
     
    superclick, Jul 29, 2006 IP
  12. chachacallis

    chachacallis Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,086
    Likes Received:
    14
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    128
    #12
    This is defiantly against the TOS as it is drawing attention to the ads.
     
    chachacallis, Jul 30, 2006 IP
  13. Kal

    Kal Peon

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    Just a quick note to all these people who "know" our site design is a violation. You might want to read this thread: forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=76658&page=2&highlight=searchenginecollege.com

    It explains that Google has already reviewed our site and given it the thumbs up.
     
    Kal, Nov 14, 2006 IP