Is the Bible due for a major revision?

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by Gomeza, Aug 18, 2012.

0
Page 3 of 3
  1. indiaholidaydiary

    indiaholidaydiary Member

    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    28
    #41
    There are lot of versions of bible but I would recon bible written by Charles Darwin because that bible truly represents facts and religion.
     
    indiaholidaydiary, Aug 20, 2012 IP
  2. satguy

    satguy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    780
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    130
    #42
    Well said, my friend,,,

    oops.. Still moving here...
     
    satguy, Aug 21, 2012 IP
  3. pladecalvo

    pladecalvo Peon

    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #43
    Huh? You mean you understood what he meant? :confused:
     
    pladecalvo, Aug 21, 2012 IP
  4. Gomeza

    Gomeza Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    412
    Likes Received:
    14
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    108
    #44
    I'm going to assume that the word "recon" is an abbreviation of the word "reconcile" but having said that I cannot help but object to characterizing Charles Darwin's published works as any form of bible. There were certainly no elements of religion, even of a subtle nature, found in any of his published work.
     
    Gomeza, Aug 21, 2012 IP
  5. Mikaël2

    Mikaël2 Member

    Messages:
    945
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    35
    #45
    It's "reckon".
     
    Mikaël2, Aug 21, 2012 IP
Page 3 of 3