it should be rejected as a concept.. if you don't want to make money this argument is silly - it's like saying 'when you write something, you should only ever submit it to one ezine site, because otherwise it's "wrong" in some way'. Or perhaps 'don't bother to use a spell checker because you should always spell check by hand'. nonsense. It's all about getting 'maximum bangs per buck'. Which you can do very easily now with any article, using software tools. By clicking a button. if you don't use the tools out there to maximize the return on your investment, you're a fool. Period.
yeah yeah, but once again, you totally miss the point. Take a well written article and get max bangs per buck from it by spinning and using it elsewhere. And you are so wrong about the quality of modern article spinners, it's sad. The technology has moved on, Mr 8 bit DOS fan. Anyone wants to see what a modern spinner can do, send me some text by PM and I'll show you, free. That offer excludes hmansfield, obviously - he already 'knows that this kind of technology can never be improved, and 'sucks'.
I would not advise anyone to use an article spinner. It is better to write them yourself, this way you can make sure that the article flows properly. Furthermore, spinning articles does not guarantee that you will get unique content in the end.