page rank shows site is more resourceful than others, so we have to required increase PR of site by taking quality back link form directories
Haha! Yeah thats about it! hehe! Apart from the obvious money making that can be made it... PR is more of an quality indicator of how G sees your site mostly relating to back links as far as I understand it. At the end of the day high page rank alone will not put your site high in the SERPS which after all is what most of us want. If you look after your site, optimise it properly and keep building quality relevant links then high SERPS is what should naturally follow.
No it doesn't. Directories are the highest form of quality? NO they are actually very easy to acquire which makes them lower quality yet they will raise PR. I am telling you right now. I have PR2-3-4 sites that are way more resourceful than many PR6-7-8 sites. PR does not mean more resourceful, quality or valuable.
Okay... - Anything else you would like to share about my life so I can be sure to be a little more accurate?
Hint: Any good actor knows it's just a very bad idea to drag out your exit. Just say goodbye and leave. If you keep coming back, especially after denigrating the locale the way you did, it just erodes whatever shred of dignity and credibility you might once have had. Go, visio. SEO Chat awaits you. Well, perhaps not... but it can't go any worse for you over there than it has here.
Sure - you're in denial as well. Feel free, by all means, to share with us your "PR2-3-4 sites", and a small sampling of the many "PR6-7-8 sites" that they "are way more resourceful than". -Michael
I agree. Sometimes PR3 sites occupy the #1 position, whereas PR6-7 sites are only at #3. My answer is also NO.
For me. I am not going to use pr to compare with serp. at least google do not tell us 'pr=serp' for sure, since I do not want my pr=0 or n/a also. so My answer is 'YES' pr still important
All my friends use the internet on daily basis but I'm the only one who knows what PageRank means. It's also worth mentioning that they've never heard this word before.
If you haven't found that out on your own giving you a list is like attempting to train a dead dog. Even PR chasers generally agree on that point.
What point? Why are you still thinking that distraction methods like that will make others not see that you can not back up the bs you are spouting? You made a claim: and I'm calling bs on it. Please, show us these sites that you claim you own that are PR2, 3, and 4 that are way more resourceful than many PR6, 7, and 8 sites in your field. Please. Enlighten us. Show us these sites so we can do a side by side comparison. We're not talking about what part PR plays in ranking, we're talking about you trying to pass off a boldfaced lie to the thousands of members here on dp as fact. You yourself don't understand how pr affects rankings, and that's fine. I could care less at this point. You're more interested in arguing and disrupting things than learning, and your refusal to go away after claiming you were done and your insults aimed at this forum proves this. But your repeated bs here is inhibiting others ability to learn. You really need to stop. -Michael
Doesn't matter. Just build up your site and write quality articles which other bloggers don't have and you will soon rank on Google. Of course you will also get a PR but don't worry about that, worry about ranking.
Well my military blog is PR 4...but it gets very few clicks. While my business and medical blogs are PR 0 but get way more clicks! Since your blog is about "pretty girls" rest assured you will get plenty of views and clicks
Excuse me didn't you just read what Minstrel and Mvanderman said? You must be a lunatic, or a big liar. No your a big liar. Ps. If you didn't catch the sarcasm I was agreeing