To get links from duplicate content is not good at all, Original content is thumb rule for getting good rank in search results.
having a link is better than having no link at all given that the link doesn't come form a bad neighborhood or illegal sites. it is however good to have links form original content site/pages. but if you have the opportunity to have easy links from duplicate content pages, i doesn't hurt to get it. you cannot get penalized for duplicate content on 3rd party site.
Many people feel the need to duplicate their pages and make small changes for each search engine (also called doorway pages) – however if this is not done properly, you will get penalized
Probably not... I mean, some duplicate content may rank OK, but the real problem here is how long it will rank before Google discovers that it is duplicate. Spun content can be OK, if it is spun properly, but either way, tread easy with that.
i just want to strength my anchor text by submitting article to more article directories. But maybe i need to spin my article a little
Best to avoid this, however, you can do what is called "content spinning" which basically rewords the same content, and search engines dont count it as duplicate content
duplicate content is not good . Duplicate content generally refers to substantive blocks of content within or across domains that either completely match other content or are appreciably similar. Mostly, this is not deceptive in origin .
If you are talking about article, then it is good if the visitor sees value in your article. If your article is crap, then it is of no use.
Sometimes my articles are copied by others (with links intact) and I see links from different blogs/websites to my site because of this. To me, a link is a link and I'm happy with this.
google find only original content if u get link on original contact then google give piroty to your link