Is it canonical issue??? Help.

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by Mohit, Dec 14, 2005.

  1. #1
    Visit http://www.cuff-daddy.com and http://store.cuff-daddy.com and then look at http://cuff-daddy.com (If posting url is violation of any rule then let me know, i will delete it. it just listed to get correct help from all of u)

    Will it count as canonical issue. Cause i am peforming good in MSN but not good in Yahoo and Google.

    What exactly is canonical issue????
     
    Mohit, Dec 14, 2005 IP
  2. yfs1

    yfs1 User Title Not Found

    Messages:
    13,798
    Likes Received:
    922
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    yfs1, Dec 14, 2005 IP
    GuyFromChicago likes this.
  3. GuyFromChicago

    GuyFromChicago Permanent Peon

    Messages:
    6,728
    Likes Received:
    529
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Unless I'm missing something those two sites are exactly the same - i.e. duplicate content. There may be some canonical issues but they will take a back seat to the duplicate content issues.

    Canonical problems can be a real bastard, I know becuase I'm dealing with trying to clean up some huge canonical problems on a site I'm responsible for. To put it in simple terms, canonical problems are a result of using different links within your site (or external) to link to the same content.

    Let's say for example you post a new article to your site in it's articles section.
    You link to the article from your index using the url ww w.tomyarticle#1.com/article/thisisit.php

    In an archive or other section of your site you link to the exact same article but you use the url ww w.tomyarticle#1.com/article/thisisit.php?ID=4

    What you've done is basically created duplicate content within your own site. The best description I've seen of the problem is in the SEOmoz.org search ranking factors article:

    It's most common to see this issue with the www vs non www primary url, but it's more complex to correct (imo) when it's spread throughout a database driven site that was incorrectly built right from the start.
     
    GuyFromChicago, Dec 14, 2005 IP