Hi I want to know ur comments about it . If im not wrong actually the inlinks advertising companies like kontera and infolinks are destroying our pr and effecting google search Bcoz they are targeting keywords in the site and hyperlink to advertiser site. So if im not wrong they are getting external links from publisher sites and giving benefit to advertiser and harming to publisher's site. IM not sure whether im right or wrong But i want u to comment on it Also any personnel from these companies can throw a light on it. Thanks
no, they are using javascript Try to right-click on a keyword and select Properties You'll see Ups Sorry i saw only for infolinks, for inlinks i don't know
ads affect your page rank. content affect your page rank. external links affect your page rank. its depends how you look at it !!!!
Kontera ContentLinks are Javascript based ads. They the links and the ads appear dynamically on a page and change in accordance with relevancy. The ads are not indexed by Google and should have no effect on PR- positive or negative. Publisher Services Manager, Kontera
Wrong, Ads have no effect on PR or how Google scores PR Wrong - Content does not fit into the equation used to determine PR Right to a degree...
Is Sem-Advance saying that a content-free web site would have the same PR as one loaded with content? Or is he/she saying that poor, non-informative content that would be useless to a human reader is as valueable to a bot as interesting and informative content?
I am saying content does not enter into the mathematical equation of how PageRank is determined. Perfect example http://www.text-link-ads.com/ PR 7 - No real content, certainly nothing life changing or mildly suspensful... http://www.webmd.com/ PR8 - Lots of valuable content.... http://www.cafemom.com/ PR 5 - More content than the 1st example, less than the second, but a PR well below the score of the other two. So as we can clearly see while great content can earn a high PR, in and of itself it has no correlation to the equation of how PageRank is determined. Further we can look at the scoring body for further clarification. As we can clearly see the word "content" is not mentioned anywhere within the above. It does say page, and that is to mean the overall value of the page including meta data, content, aging, authority, etc....
I think they could be, because I imagine google does not like them too much as it disrupts search engine spiders from finding the right content on your site or blog.
I hope you have proof of this as otherwise you are merely writing misinformation that nobody needs .....