Ah, well he's climbed backed out of his hole a little bit, but the fact remains, MOST americans still disaprove
Ah, yes, Hitler's third cousin who fights peaceful terrorists, eats babies, masterminded 9/11, puts peaceful head choppers in high class Hilton Hotels, has the ability to make hurricanes from a single breath, once called himself "King," listens to your phone calls if you are an average America (all Average Americans are members of al qaida). Of course, it depends on who you ask
The media didn't put our troops in harm's way. So just how much are you going to blame the "media skew"? Is the media responsible for 60% of the countries opinion? 40? 20? Contrary to what either party would have you believe when the polls are against them, we are not a country of dullards.
I think the reason why it went from 38% to 37% in late june to early july is because he called himself king.. --> Proof
Lobsters aren't blue! "bush lied, people died" I would have noted it above. Did you miss it? And you had a point?
I don't know how to respond to that bait other than to state my post again and hope you actually address it this time with an actual direct counter to what each line says.... if you have one
Media is a propaganda tool. It is able to make a most of the country angry or most of the whole country to feel safe. In US it's free so media companies can freely give the president a bad picture which is an endless interest for Arab Sheiks, Chinese businessmen that more or less owns the most important networks such as CNN, CBS, MSNBC and especially New York Times. In Europe, BBC, SVT... the major media network are usually more or less controlled by the state in order to more easily manipulate the people.
Yes, it's big news. Bush is now not a president but a king. He appointed himself a few weeks ago.. --> Proof
Isn't that the thread where we asked for proof and it turns out teh comment was taken out of context?
I thought it would be obvious. Forgive me for making that assumption Line 1: The media didn't put our troops in harm's way. Response: Lobsters aren't blue! Why?: Because I didn't say or suggest what you wrote in Line 1. Therefore, my response was to counter with something you didn't say or suggest either. Line 2: So just how much are you going to blame the "media skew"? Is the media responsible for 60% of the countries opinion? 40? 20? Response: I would have noted it above. Did you miss it? Why?: I didn't mention a number because I noted "It's difficult to factor in" Line 3: Contrary to what either party would have you believe when the polls are against them, we are not a country of dullards. Response: And you had a point? Why?: I mentioned nothing of political parties nor dullards. So surely you had a point. Let me know if you need anymore help. Oh yes, I almost forgot: "bush lied, people died"
Ahh much better. I know it can be fun at times attempt jokes that sound good in your head out loud, but keep it in moderation or no one will know when to take you seriously As for your replies, in other words you didn't mean any of what I took your meaning to be and everything I said you don't really have a counter for? Wouldn't s imple touché have sufficed? BTW everyone... I checked them all when I voted because I'm an a'hole like that.
I see Latehorn is either making up facts or talking about subjests he knows nothing about - dude, do you really expect people to take you seriously? CNN, CNBC and MSNBC are owned by General Electric, who incidently donated 1.1 million to Bush's election campaign. As you can see, the board of directors of General Electric is crammed full of Arabs and Chinese CBS is owned by the Westinghouse Group, who's head of the board of directors is Frank Carlucci - also chairman of the Carlyle Group and Donald Rumsfelds old buddy. The Carlyle group incidently have billions of $$ tied up in defence contracts with the Bush administration. Carlucci's other claims to fame include being Secretary of Defence under Regan and Deputy Director of the CIA. Exactly the kind of guy a shadowy group of Arabs would put in charge huh Latehorn? New York Times - Owned by the very famous Chinese company Clear Channel who took a very anti-Bush stance when they tried to block anti-war protesters from buying up advertising through their media. Clear Chennel based in the Chinese city of San Antonio in Texas and has Mark "Mao Tse Tung" Mays as CEO and President. A summary of Mark's political donations can be seen here As other have said before me Latehorn, I suggest you take a bit more time to find out about the subject matter before you blindly post