Is Dmoz Submission worth?

Please explain how an inactive editor ruins the place more than somebody (like you I imagine) who has never volunteered there at all.

 

Like Jim, I would love to know how they are ruining the place. Please explain.

 

I guess the argument would run that inactive editors mean that site suggestions are not being listed fast enough. That ignores that editors are volunteers working in their spare time, that they do agree when accepted as editors to a minimum edit of one per four months, DMOZ only asks that of us and perhaps more importantly that DMOZ does not undertake to review suggested sites in a time frame acceptable to owners because they are not DMOZ's focus, that is on end users and DMOZ and its editors have no concern for any value that might attach to a listing.

 

I agree with you that it is not inactive editors that ruin DMOZ, it is all the Admins and Metas who thrive on corruption, incompetence and petty vanity that ruin the directory.

 

More dribble..........

 

Shouldn´t you be an Admin by now?

 

Julian wants you to think this is him



When in actuality, this is what he really looks like

 

Picture of Mia, thinking hard about posting something witty and miserably failing.

 

When we submitted our site into DMOZ, We never know it was added or not. I think it's not that much effective.