it was not the first time Gaza was "flatten" and it won't be the last, as long as there is occupation, people will fight back with whatever they have, like Southern Lebanon been "flatten" before it stood up from between the dust and pushed the occupation back.
It is good that you admit to your limitation, so I try to explain it little bit more so you understand. If you try to give some moral aspect to this situation you will lose, why? Who is occupying a land? Israel Who is fighting the occupation? Palestinian Who has killed more civilians in this conflict? Israel. The killing of innocents on both side is the result of an armed conflict, which has been going on for many years. The only way to stop it, is to stop the armed conflict. How can you stop this conflict and force both sides to come to a compromise? By stopping USA in meddling in this conflict, otherwise the stalemate and killing of innocents will continue for many years to come.
So we both agree Lebanon ate dust and gaza should have some as well. Here you go, put this on your bumper
That's the entire depth of your argument? That it's Israel's fault and the conflict is going on because of the USA meddling only? Damn, dude, you must not read a single word of what imad writes here. Anyways, the correct answer is both sides are wrong when innocent people get killed. I personally don't cheer on deaths because people are on the "wrong side." Most people killed in conflicts don't choose any side, instead death chooses them. The Israelis and the Palestinians should be negotiating a peaceful settlement. Neither side should violate cease-fires and all major international leaders (including the USA, Canada, Russia, China, etc) should push both sides for peace. Armchair quarterbacks at DP should also be promoting peace, rather than cheering on war from the comfort of their computer terminals.
I wish I had a billion dollars too but it is not going to happen. As long as USA is involved in this conflict, Israel will have no motivation for compromise (which what peace is). In fact it will be quite stupid for them to do it and it is kind of treason for their politicians to give up a wining hand.
it depends what you meant by the term ate dust, I meant Southern Lebanon been destroyed completely and turned to dust but that did not kill the resistance, if you mean by dust they been defeated then no I do not agree, because Israel is the one who ate dust in this case.