Any real sources for that? Something besides "Blame America First" conspiracy sites? NYT, LAT, FOX, CBS, ABC, NBC?
Don't you think it's strange that nothing has been reported about the data recorders? (or maybe it has and I've just missed it )
No source? Nothing from NYT, LAT, FOX, CBS, ABC, NBC? Boston Globe? USA Today? It just appears on a hodgepodge of conspiracy and "blame America first" sites one day? Surely there must be some "unbiased" source, somewhere?
When all else fails... Flight recorder information? http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/08/08/attack/main567436.shtml Yes, strange indeed that nothing has been reported about the data recorders
Until the government releases information on those flight recorders I'm sticking to the evidence that 911 was an inside job.
They already did, 9/11. People who seek the truth know.??? INSANITY Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results….
2 Years according to the IAEA published a couple of days ago. - So there is a threat if you combine it with the statements the primeminister of this country made recently. - Clear like cristal!
'US planning strike against Iran' By JPOST.COM STAFF The United States government reportedly began coordinating with NATO its plans for a possible military attack against Iran. The German newspaper Der Tagesspiegel collected various reports from the German media indicating that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization are examining the prospects of such a strike. According to the report, CIA Director Porter Goss, in his last visit to Turkey on December 12, requested Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan to provide military bases to the United States in 2006 from where they would be able to launch an assault. The German news agency DDP also noted that countries neighboring Iran, such as Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Oman, and Pakistan were also updated regarding the supposed plan. American sources sent to those countries apparently mentioned an aerial attack as a possibility, but did not provide a time frame for the operation. Although Der Spiegel could not say that these plans were concrete, they did note that according to a January 2005 New Yorker report American forces had entered Iran in 2005 in order to mark possible targets for an aerial assault. http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1135696369601
Well, if there are troops whatso ever arriving in Turkey then you know it's on. Or it can be considered as a very strong indication it's going to happen and it's being done to flex the muscles so to speak and let Iran backdown from what they are doing.
If Bush weren't such a dick, he might still have his military base in Uzbekistan, just a hop or 2 away from Iran.
A strike on Iran would most likely just be air strikes on their nuclear (or "new-cue-lar" if you're Dubya) facilities. Why would anyone have a problem with that?
Unless you're sure it won't provoke Iran to declare war, or provoke Russia, China and other backers of Iran to get involved, and that it won't harm/kill civilians - I don't have a problem with it
Good point. This bombing of Iran would set the stage for World War 3, after which the globalists/Illuminati would be able to transfer full power to the UN and possibly push for world government. If China and Russia both attack the US, we would be greatly weakened even if we win, allowing the UN/NATO to take control.
Newest response from Iran TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- Iran's chief nuclear negotiator has rejected a Russian offer to produce nuclear fuel in its plants for Iran, the latest effort to resolve a diplomatic impasse over Tehran's nuclear program.
latehorn, with that post you're making yourself sound exceptionally unintelligent. Your use of punctuation and grammar are poor and you apparently haven't studied anything other than fox news. The US may have enough nukes to bomb China but If Russia and China fire on the US everyone living here will die. The sad thing is, after China blows the US off the map they will still have hundreds of millions of people left. Its called MAD(mutually assured destruction) If you had done serious reading, you would know that China has prepared itself to lose the majority of their cities on the east coast due to a nuclear attack from the US. In simple terms: The Chinese government are willing to sacrifice millions of their own people to win a nuclear exchange with the US. The Chinese can afford to lose more of their people than we can. China and Russia have begun conducting joint military exercies together last year. The US can't push any of them around, and the US doesn't need to. Can you explain to me exactly how Iran is a threat even if they do get nukes? China has nukes and doesn't really like the US but does that make them a threat? If your neighbor owned a RPG and you owned an RPG and your neighbored told you to get rid of your RPG because you are dangerous but they wouldn't get rid of their own RPG would you get rid of your RPG, hypothetically speaking?