IRAN : We will not stop , and we are ready for WAR

proof on that please??

 

Don't worry any moron can register there and add what ever they want, if it was not you, must be one of your friends in stupid central.

 

It could be anyone. We go way back. We don't red each other and we don't go crying to moderators. We've had some battles. But I wouldn't do that to you and I give you my word (I value my word, unlike some here) that it was not me. I just came across it on a search for a DP post you made.

Still, it is funny

 

as my grandmother used to say: "the truth hurts, and you have to live with it."

 

I don't think it was you either.

It can be the head of missing balls brigade who was running around and giving anonymous reds or one of your other crazy supporters. May be you should look at your supporters and start thinking about what is wrong with your ideas that attracts these kind of people.

 

I will look for that article. but USA is funding two terroist group that are against iran.

Also iran won't struck first, if a war does happen,it will be us that will struck first.

Also I doubt there will be any war between usa and Iran. As us is stuck in iraq, (they need to finish the job in iraq, or leave iraq, as us is a easy target in iraq, if it attack iran) and its costing the us a lot of money, which the government is cutting a lot funds from different organaztion. Even at my job at the city, they cut our staff by 40% because of lack of fund, and there are too many anti-war people in us. and once democrat come in office, they won't start a war.

Also if us does attack iran, what government will it replace it with?
Will it be MEK or Shah? which the people don't want.

 

I'm in a generous mood tonight (been a great day for sales!), so I'll help ya out. The article you are looking for was posted by mcfox over in this thread page.

I took the liberty of correcting the assumption for him

 

that just talks about,
also I read that spend us spends $6 million per-year on groups that are against iran.

 

What part did you correct? Do you mean repeating your usual nonsense that had nothing to do with the article or the subject of discussion?

 

The only wise thing to do if you want your enemy on knees. If US really wants to get rid of current Iran regime it has to start fighting inside their territory. They have to fund groups of people that are against regime.
Because the world is closely watching and to prevent demonization in the world press against US everything has to go quiet on the ground without any civilian casulties and suffering. US has to choose young open-minded people who want freedom and slowly start the process. When those secular but still faithful people are on driving seat of Iran it really would not matter if Iran has nuclear weapons. If you look objectively on the matter they have all the right to build up since other countries has it also...

 

Ya probably that is what he did... because he has nothing better to do then to sit here in the politics forum and make up crap...

 

funny that you question which part he corrected, but you didn't question the correction, maybe because you know you can't argue against it, as usual.

 

That's why I like arguing with gworld! He won't debate the facts, because he knows I'm right. So his only recourse is to call me names and launch into a tirade of personal attacks. Which works great for me, I don't mind the name calling! I'm flattered when he and other's only recourse is personal attacks. Just means I'm right and they can't counter the truth

 

I would discuss the facts if your post had any in it but it was your usual nonsense of we are good, everyone else is bad and if you don't agree then you are terrorist supporter.

 

U.N. calls U.S. data on Iran's nuclear aims unreliable
Tips about supposed secret weapons sites and documents with missile designs haven't panned out, diplomats say.
By Bob Drogin and Kim Murphy, Times Staff Writers
February 25, 2007

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...5feb25,0,4451045.story?coll=la-home-headlines

 

Is this why the UNSC is considering yet more sanctions against Iran?

 

us has been doing that alredy for a while.

 

Gworld really stop posting here.. it's a waste of time... it's like your talking to the sons who own CNN... waste of ur time...

 

putting gworld on ignore helps stop the spread of lies - thats if everyone put him on ignore that is. Although you are showing yourself to be playing in the bushes with him so I don't think it would help you much.

 

Well here I go

Nice song's title, or ain't this Breakdance film theme?