Iran positive view? don't hold your breath

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by mahmood, Jun 7, 2006.

  1. #1
    Nearly all politicians are talking about Iran's positive approach to the new proposal given by 5+1. Even Bush showed some sign of optimism. I hear oil price cooled down in reaction to this news.

    Lets test my knowlege of mullahs behavior.

    I say all these politicians are wrong and Iran would never stop uranium enrichment.

    Iran will countinue enrichment of Uranium and all these talks are to buy some time. The base of my prediction is that I know mullahs need atomic bomb. They need it to gurantee their existance. No other carrot would satisfy them.

    I just hope that Bush doesn't really believe what he said and is just playing the game that European and democrats push him to.

    .
     
    mahmood, Jun 7, 2006 IP
  2. latehorn

    latehorn Guest

    Messages:
    4,676
    Likes Received:
    238
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Yeah, Bush have to. Other people and politicans have abused him many times.

    As to this issue, it seems that Irans millitary power have growed way too fast then expected. Their new underwater missiles can destroy any american ship or submarine. So it's seems more and more that the war option is becoming irrelevant. Hopefully, the mullahs leave their power-throne after Israel is destroyed but we never know.
     
    latehorn, Jun 7, 2006 IP
  3. mahmood

    mahmood Guest

    Messages:
    1,228
    Likes Received:
    43
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Wrong, mullahs are even weaker that Sadam and this is the point. This is the reason they seek atomic bomb.

    As I said earlier they will never retract unless they see a big big fist and the only fist they are afraid is US army and this was the reason the suspended enrichement for a while - and not negotiation as many thought -.

    I cannot prove what I said about mullahs power but I claim that all these politicians are wrong and mullahs are only buying time, and time will prove me - or prove me wrong of course -.

    .
     
    mahmood, Jun 7, 2006 IP
  4. moq

    moq Guest

    Messages:
    352
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    r u trying to say that U.S.A should attack IRAN as they did in IRAQ
     
    moq, Jun 7, 2006 IP
  5. mahmood

    mahmood Guest

    Messages:
    1,228
    Likes Received:
    43
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    I am trying to say that if mullahs feel that US is going to attack them, they would stop otherwise no negotiation/carrot would stop them.

    This is a good time to prove this point. You can read everywhere that hope has been raised about Iran stopping its neuclear enrichment, even oil prices went down but We are going to see that mullahs keep enriching and buying time.

    Sometimes I think how the world is ridicules, If Iran stops it's enrichment -which won't -they would say "Did you see Bush was wrong and we were right." and if Iran doesn't stop they would say "Bush is to blamed, he should have done this and that." Isn't this stupid? Instead of accepting their defeat everybody is trying to put the blame on Bush.
     
    mahmood, Jun 7, 2006 IP
  6. GTech

    GTech Rob Jones for President!

    Messages:
    15,836
    Likes Received:
    571
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Sounds like North Korea all over again. They got nukes and technology and Jimmy Carter managed a nobel peace prize for his efforts to enable them. Strange world we live in.

    You are most correct mahmood, no matter what is said in public, they are not going to stop their efforts. World domination is part of the religious ideology. One big ol' caliphate. Reminds me of the Borg; resistance is futile.
     
    GTech, Jun 7, 2006 IP
  7. latehorn

    latehorn Guest

    Messages:
    4,676
    Likes Received:
    238
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    I suggest you to read this.

    Considering that Iran actually won the 8 year long war with Saddam despite that Iraq got foreign intelligense support, proves for me that the mullahs was stronger back then + they've not had as Iraq 60% of their millitary equippment destroyed when Saddam went into Kuwait.

    Saddam got only Scud missiles, Ahmedjadh are using a redesign ko-dong missile. They also got the fastest underwater-missile in the whole world.

    They have also had the opportunity to learn from Saddams recent mistakes. I think Iran is already pointing their Shahab missiles at US&UK bases in Iraq, Turkey and Afganistan. They are probably also pointing their underwater missiles at US naval ships. So an attack must begin with a fast evacuation/attacking-missile-silos process or high casualties will be a fact.
     
    latehorn, Jun 7, 2006 IP
  8. Mong

    Mong ↓↘→ horsePower

    Messages:
    4,789
    Likes Received:
    734
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    235
    #8
    I think nuclear weapons are harmful for humanity no matter it kills asians or americans.

    I know it cannot happen :eek:
    But best way is to waste all nuclear weapons voluntarily to save humanity.
     
    Mong, Jun 7, 2006 IP
  9. latehorn

    latehorn Guest

    Messages:
    4,676
    Likes Received:
    238
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    That require agreements, because if everybody except China agrees etc, China would get the lord status over all countries in the whole world and nobody would like that. Even if everybody would agree on that, it would be much easier to start conventional warfare between post nuclear powers which would results in a lot casualties and probably a WW3.
     
    latehorn, Jun 7, 2006 IP
  10. moq

    moq Guest

    Messages:
    352
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    I dont understand y EU and especially U.S.A are against IRAN + Nuclear Weapon...
    and why
    U.S.A does not sign the non-proliferation treaty!
     
    moq, Jun 8, 2006 IP
  11. mcfox

    mcfox Wind Maker

    Messages:
    7,526
    Likes Received:
    716
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #11
    Because Iran's stated intention is to obliterate Israel, so many nations are very concerned that once Iran has successfully developed nuclear weapons, the first thing they will do is deploy them against Israel = WW3
     
    mcfox, Jun 8, 2006 IP
  12. mahmood

    mahmood Guest

    Messages:
    1,228
    Likes Received:
    43
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    Do you mean that USA should sign that? If your answer is yes then you definitely don't want Iran to have atomic bomb. If you have one reason for US then you would have ten reasons for Iran.

    .
     
    mahmood, Jun 8, 2006 IP
  13. maldives

    maldives Prominent Member

    Messages:
    7,187
    Likes Received:
    902
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #13
    Iraq was offered the same but wanted a fight. Iran is no different.
     
    maldives, Jun 8, 2006 IP
  14. mahmood

    mahmood Guest

    Messages:
    1,228
    Likes Received:
    43
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    Thanks for supporting my idea.

    If mullahs don't stop with iron feast how do these stupid politicians belive that they would stop by some carrots?

    Read this translation of Ahmadi Nejad: "They think we are children and they can give us a candy and get the gold."
    .
     
    mahmood, Jun 8, 2006 IP