The US secretary of state has accused Iran and Syria of fuelling anti-Western sentiment, in a row over cartoons satirising the Prophet Muhammad. You don't believe it? Look: In a country that even eating and drinking and dressing has stupid rules and nobody alive dare to break them, look how they stone Norwign embasi in Tehran right before Mullahs forces eyes. Find an Iranian and ask them who these people are. answer: "they are under cover forces." .
You are absolutely right, and this is what was supposed to happen. The people who put the cartoon in the newspaper, while they had a right to put it there, knew that this would happen. But they did it anyway. Why? Simple. So when they start rioting Condi can say that "look, they are a bunch of animals." Then Bush is supposed to get more support for his Iran attack right? Its called being an instigator, or divide and conquer. They're not fooling me. Lol, Tom Clancy couldn't write stuff this good.
Just correct myself. These photos are taken from UK embasi. Denmark had already been burned down and lots of damages had been done to norweign. - during last week.- Don't you find it strange that news about attacks in Iran are less known than Syria and Lebanan. I don't, it is always like that.
lol exactly. Bush didn't have to pull one of his uber secret plans for me to figure that one out. Anyway that treats Women and people in general the way the Middle East does are animals
Not even animals, more like rabid animals. And we all know what happens to rabid animals. =x P.S. how the hell do you spell rabid? I think I spelled it wrong lol I'm on dial up ATM and wont be going to google the correct def. =x
Thanks If it was a conspiracy, I welcome it. Why should just part of the world see their real faces? Why not everybody? By the way, in case of Iran these are not common people, they get paid to gather where are needed. They have other jobs as well such as beating women for non-slamic dressing and arresting youngs for having an opposite sex friend. - Laughing in some months and days of the year is illegal as well for example the day that Khomeini died - Say this was a conspiracy to get people ready for attacking Iran, then why mullas themselves help Bush? .
See for yourself: http://observer.guardian.co.uk/ayearinfrance/story/0,,1707997,00.html These type of reports about Iran are not rare but a European paper admitting it is very rare. If there was a free election in Iran I wouldn't need to bring a British weekly paper to prove the point. As I know gurus here may not have the time to read it I bring part of it here: .
Well, if Condi says something, it must be true. After all, she has such an impeccable record: http://www.princetonprog.com/archives/2005/09/the_lies_of_con.html