IP and Chargeback

Discussion in 'Payment Processing' started by kolucoms6, Mar 1, 2009.

0
  1. #1
    When customer pays by their own, and later when they file for chargeback as UN-AUTHORISED charge , paypal doesn't take help of IP used to pay the money and IP used to launch the charge back case ?
     
    kolucoms6, Mar 1, 2009 IP
  2. Valdum

    Valdum Guest

    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Yep, I learned the hard way that the reason financial institutions don't support the merchants in these cases is it's very profitable. The way these work the merchant has all the risks, the bank just sits back and takes the fees. It's actually in the banks interests that fraudulant use of cards is perpetuated.
     
    Valdum, Mar 1, 2009 IP
  3. kolucoms6

    kolucoms6 Active Member

    Messages:
    1,198
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    75
    #3
    Means ?

    Also, I recently heard that US banks STOPPED charging 35$ or so which they used to charge for EACH chargeback ?

    True ?
     
    kolucoms6, Mar 1, 2009 IP
  4. digitalpointdevine

    digitalpointdevine Peon

    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    PayPal does not base decision on a chargeback claim based on IP address.
     
    digitalpointdevine, Mar 1, 2009 IP
  5. kolucoms6

    kolucoms6 Active Member

    Messages:
    1,198
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    75
    #5
    Even if the credit owner paid the amt by themselves , they can file for un-authorised charge claim ?

    Any solution for winning that claim ?
     
    kolucoms6, Mar 1, 2009 IP