Interesting new 'link' technique. Spoofed link removal requests!

Discussion in 'Link Development' started by mcfox, Mar 9, 2006.

  1. #1
    I got an interesting email the other day from a Data recovery website explaining that someone had spoofed their email address and was asking webmasters to remove any links to their site. I hadn't received any such email until today ... from a 'different' data recovery site.

    It seems like someone has come up with a new way to increase their own link popularity in the field of data recovery ... by spoofing emails asking people to remove links to their competitors.

    Here's a copy of some of the text:

     
    mcfox, Mar 9, 2006 IP
    Jat and Smyrl like this.
  2. mystikmedia

    mystikmedia Jedi Master

    Messages:
    5,564
    Likes Received:
    498
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    270
    #2
    Same here. I got the same thing a few days ago. At first I removed the link. Then the site owner's link checking system detected the link was removed, talked to him, found out about the whole deal, and then added it back. I then received another email of the same nature a day or so later! I just forwarded it to the site owner that time and didn't take any further action.
     
    mystikmedia, Mar 9, 2006 IP
    mcfox likes this.
  3. mdvaldosta

    mdvaldosta Peon

    Messages:
    4,079
    Likes Received:
    362
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Interesting new concept. Seems some people will do anything to not focus on their own websites :/
     
    mdvaldosta, Mar 9, 2006 IP
  4. samsam

    samsam Peon

    Messages:
    647
    Likes Received:
    53
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    I am sure this will multiply in the coming days.
     
    samsam, Mar 9, 2006 IP
  5. mcfox

    mcfox Wind Maker

    Messages:
    7,526
    Likes Received:
    716
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #5
    I thought so too, which is why I posted about it.

    Lol. It does make you wonder. :rolleyes: This would have taken a bit of work to research the various sites involved.
     
    mcfox, Mar 9, 2006 IP
    Jat likes this.
  6. Nathan Malone

    Nathan Malone Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    369
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #6
    Interesting tactic, though it is clearly unethical.
     
    Nathan Malone, Mar 9, 2006 IP
    onedollar likes this.
  7. nate_king1

    nate_king1 Active Member

    Messages:
    951
    Likes Received:
    25
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    70
    #7
    LOL. That was me.. Nice to meet your MystikMedia
     
    nate_king1, Mar 9, 2006 IP
  8. mcfox

    mcfox Wind Maker

    Messages:
    7,526
    Likes Received:
    716
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #8
    Without a doubt. I wonder about the legality of it too since the intention is to deliberately harm business using fraudulent means and by falsely claiming to represent an individual or business entity.
     
    mcfox, Mar 9, 2006 IP
  9. magellan

    magellan Guest

    Messages:
    155
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    I received one of these e-mails supposedly from a data recovery site I had linked to. I have since forwarded this e-mail onto the site's webmaster. I did not delete the link as I had another webmaster warn me of what was going on a few weeks ago.
     
    magellan, Mar 22, 2006 IP
  10. Dakait

    Dakait Banned

    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    11
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    I don't find anything in this which should be called as tactic and concept. I know the basic concept of having external links - "recommended site" And recommended site is always relevant according to the protocol.

    I was doing the same before the algo updates....it's common sense.
     
    Dakait, Mar 22, 2006 IP
  11. mad4

    mad4 Peon

    Messages:
    6,986
    Likes Received:
    493
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    They could have just emailed all the sites and politely asked for a link rather than trying to remove their competitors links :confused:
     
    mad4, Mar 22, 2006 IP