Interesting article on link aging filter.

Discussion in 'Link Development' started by E Doc Tong, Apr 11, 2005.

  1. #1
    E Doc Tong, Apr 11, 2005 IP
  2. T0PS3O

    T0PS3O Feel Good PLC

    Messages:
    13,219
    Likes Received:
    777
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Looking at my KWT stats I see otherwise...
     
    T0PS3O, Apr 11, 2005 IP
  3. E Doc Tong

    E Doc Tong Peon

    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    14
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Can you give any more info?
    Such as:

    How long the site has been indexed by google.
    Proportion of co-op links to permanent links from other sources.
    How long those links have been in place.
    How long in the co-op.
    Competitive KWs?

    Anything else you can think of (that you don't mind sharing) that might help to understand what's going on.

    I've seen great results on Y! and MSN with the co-op but absolutely no change with Google whatsoever. Most of my co-op targeted sites are quite new, so the sudden jump in Y! and MSN has been quite noticable :p But not all sites - some are quite old sites that use to do 'ok' in all three, but after 'florida' have never really done particularly well on Google (not 1st page)

    Is it your opinion that the link-aging filter theory is incorrect?

    Would love to get some of that free Google action again - traffic from MSN is pretty crap, bit better with Y! and, from what I remember, (free) Google traffic converts pretty good too - (adwords visitors convert WAAAAAY better).
     
    E Doc Tong, Apr 11, 2005 IP
  4. tfbpa

    tfbpa The....Alive

    Messages:
    896
    Likes Received:
    35
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    120
    #4
    IMO the age linking factor does exsist, but it mearly means that not the FULL weight is given to that link, it still does give SOME weight to it.

    There will always be given some weight by SE's to new links, otherwise they would not be quick enough to follow up on new phenomena, such as disasters and news items.

    For me the co-op works very well in Google too, it just took a few more weeks, in comparison to MSN/Yahoo, to see the results.
     
    tfbpa, Apr 11, 2005 IP
  5. crazyhorse

    crazyhorse Peon

    Messages:
    1,137
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    Agreed, altough i believe the more competitive the keyword , the longer it will take before the links will benefit from the full weight. :D
     
    crazyhorse, Apr 11, 2005 IP
  6. T0PS3O

    T0PS3O Feel Good PLC

    Messages:
    13,219
    Likes Received:
    777
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Those patents are not necessarily what's already in place. More about what has yet to come.

    I have a few brand new pages I chucked some weight at and got #1-6 in Goolge in no time without any other links apart frmo an internal sietwide img link. The phrase is competitive enough, plenty of searches 2M (it used to be higher actually) results.

    I have no time to go into it deeper.
     
    T0PS3O, Apr 11, 2005 IP
  7. crazyhorse

    crazyhorse Peon

    Messages:
    1,137
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    Thats isnt a brand new website is it? Otherwise im doing something wrong. :confused:
     
    crazyhorse, Apr 11, 2005 IP
  8. T0PS3O

    T0PS3O Feel Good PLC

    Messages:
    13,219
    Likes Received:
    777
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Site is 1.5 yrs old. The page in question was new.
     
    T0PS3O, Apr 11, 2005 IP