Interesting Adsense Placement [with Images]

Discussion in 'AdSense' started by amitpagarwal, Jan 16, 2007.

  1. #1
    Am not sure if this violates Adsense TOS but it's creative anyway.

    [​IMG]
     
    amitpagarwal, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  2. CountryBoy

    CountryBoy Prominent Member

    Messages:
    8,970
    Likes Received:
    754
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #2
    That's okay because there is one image associated with 4 (or 2) links in the ad unit. The big problem arises when there is one image per link unit, all neatly lined up. See the Inside AdSense blog: adsense.blogspot.com/2006/12/ad-and-image-placement-policy.html
     
    CountryBoy, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  3. The Stealthy One

    The Stealthy One Well-Known Member Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    3,043
    Likes Received:
    54
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    #3
    Yes, that should be fine. And it's clever too! :)
     
    The Stealthy One, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  4. fi5hbone

    fi5hbone Peon

    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Above all else, those are some nice quality images!
     
    fi5hbone, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  5. Asia-Team

    Asia-Team Peon

    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    Cool Hopes GG does not rule this one out again
     
    Asia-Team, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  6. TheBen

    TheBen Active Member

    Messages:
    131
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    #6
    hi,

    really clever , i like it :D.
     
    TheBen, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  7. matt-baker

    matt-baker Guest

    Messages:
    390
    Likes Received:
    24
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    The only thing I am concerned about is this:

    "If your visitors believe that the images and the ads are directly associated, or that the advertiser is offering the exact item found in the neighboring image, they may click the ad expecting to find something that isn't actually being offered."

    You need to make sure that the user doesn't associate the image with the ad unit, and I'm sorry to say that the first of the two examples makes the image look like it is part of the ad unit.
     
    matt-baker, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  8. VamPY

    VamPY Peon

    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    There will always be people who think that ads and the images are associated. So what should a publisher do? take out his brains and put it in the freezer? I think Google should lighten up and I don't see anything wrong with the ads, they're tastefully done IMO
     
    VamPY, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  9. qwestcommunications

    qwestcommunications Notable Member

    Messages:
    8,868
    Likes Received:
    172
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    233
    #9
    The top image seems to be pointing to the ads in a very covert way.
     
    qwestcommunications, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  10. oseymour

    oseymour Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,960
    Likes Received:
    92
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    135
    #10
    its a good implementation but its sitting on the fence. They may or may not accept it
     
    oseymour, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  11. Pietercornelis

    Pietercornelis Guest

    Messages:
    631
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    I definately wouldn't risk that!
     
    Pietercornelis, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  12. frisby

    frisby Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,378
    Likes Received:
    39
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #12
    I don't believe this is OK. :/
     
    frisby, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  13. Mohammed Elnahrawi

    Mohammed Elnahrawi Peon

    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    Yes, the visitor will click the ads because he thought there is a relationship between image and ad links
     
    Mohammed Elnahrawi, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  14. brainet

    brainet Active Member

    Messages:
    1,383
    Likes Received:
    25
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #14
    did some one has proven this method to increase ctr? or someone has email the google team about this kind of placement?
     
    brainet, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  15. darkbreed

    darkbreed Peon

    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    the problem with increasing ctr is that it doesnt neccessary mean increased income. You may be smartpriced if you have low conversions, and start getting really stinkass amount per click. Happened to me when I was running images close to ads, so I removed the images and the income increased again.
     
    darkbreed, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  16. PoisonedX

    PoisonedX Peon

    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    A very creative idea I must say but if you know the owner of that site, advice him to email G and ask them if he is breaking any rule.
     
    PoisonedX, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  17. kimi

    kimi Peon

    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #17
    one of my site already using this approach. already email google, and they gave a green light. however, my ads got border.
     
    kimi, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  18. adbie

    adbie Peon

    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    when did you email google?
     
    adbie, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  19. kawebspy

    kawebspy Peon

    Messages:
    491
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    i think let us Google decide if this technique is okay or not
     
    kawebspy, Jan 16, 2007 IP
  20. kimi

    kimi Peon

    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    i sent an email to them on 24 dec 06 and got replied on 27 dec 06.
     
    kimi, Jan 19, 2007 IP