Intelligent design Vs Organic evolution I am more of an agnostic person... and am a resercher in the field of ecology and evolution... I am not sure if there is something like god that existed... but I am not sure of its absense... I am more convinced by the theories of Organic Evolution than Intelligent design (God created everything in a couple of days...) But I always wondered... maybe... the organic evolution itself is a processes... started/created/controlled by god... whats your opinion ??
I will have to stick with creative design, I do not belive in God. I belive Aliens created us. Let me explain... Evolution is proven falls many times, even darwin started to doubt it. There have been Giants, http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_giant_skeleton.htm There have been Pyramids, in China, Bosnia, Iran, Egypt, South America. The biggest in China, no foreigners allowed but its the size of 36 Empire state buildings, 3 times bigger than the egyptian one. And it gots 15 smaller ones around it, more than the egyptian 2. http://www.earthquest.co.uk/china/china.html There have been a 10.000 year old underwater civilization, that also had a pyramid, (atlantis)? http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/phikent/japan/japan2.html All of these ancient civilizations talks about beings or gods from other worlds bringing them civilization. Evolution is bull, Man did not evolve from apes but they where extracted and experimented on from ape genes.
Lay off the meth, it'll do you some good. I believe in evolution. If you want to know why, read this. It has lots of good information.
I first heard about the intelligent design theory about two years ago and thought that it might be interesting. But, the more I read about it the more stupid it started to seem. Not only it is a nonscientific nonsense, but it is also plain boring - all major questions and challenges of today's biology are being solved with a single argument - God did it. It breaks almost every rule of a scientific theory and accepted scientific standards and I really can't believe that it got so much attention.
I believe in both. I always find it insulting when people, particularly religious people, say that evolution doesn't exist. That is like saying that God is so inferior that he is unable to create a species that would modify itself to acclimate to its enviroment. The fact of the matter is species do change over time. Every time you wash your hands with Anti-Bacterial soap you are helping evolve the bacteria into a kind of "super bacteria", as the 1% that is not affected by the handwash will reproduce passing on the gene that makes them resistent. If, however, you are speaking of the whole "Humans came from primates" thing... I can't rule the fact out, though I tend to lean more to the creative design side. But if it was the case that we came from primates, where did those primates come from?
Thats your theory, one site saying its a oax, and 100.000 saying it is real. Now im not saying youre dumb, you only have to expand your mind. Most people in America live in small redneck towns and belive that God created the world 6000 years ago. One thing many people forgett is that the evolution theory, is a theory. It has not been proven but its the most respected theory among scientists. Nothing more.
God dosent exist, Primates are the essence of humanity, the aliens created us using primates, dont underestimate them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6387611.stm Just add a little more brain capacity in the alien lab and you have homo sapiens.
Simple. Primates came from earlier species. All you need to do is follow the chain further and further back. The hominids are the members of the biological family Hominidae (the great apes), which includes humans, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans. to Apes are the members of the Hominoidea superfamily of primates, which includes humans. Under current classification, there are two families of hominoids: * the family Hylobatidae consists of 4 genera and 12 species of gibbons, including the Lar Gibbon and the Siamang, collectively known as the "lesser apes" * the family Hominidae consisting of orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, and humans,[1][2] collectively known as the "great apes". to Catarrhini is a parvorder of the Primates, one of the three major divisions of the suborder Haplorrhini. It contains the Old World monkeys (superfamily Cercopithecoidea, family Cercopithecidae) and the apes (superfamily Hominoidea). The latter is further divided into the lesser apes (family Hylobatidae), consisting of the gibbons; and the hominids or great apes (family Hominidae), consisting of the orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, and humans. to The haplorrhines, the "dry-nosed" primates (the Greek name means "simple-nosed"), are members of the Haplorrhini clade: the prosimian tarsiers and all of the true simians (the monkeys and the apes, including humans). to A primate (L. primus, first) is any member of the biological order Primates, the group that contains all the species commonly related to the lemurs, monkeys, and apes, with the latter category including humans. to The Euarchontoglires (synonymous with Supraprimates) are a mammalian superorder based on molecular genetic sequence analyses and retrotransposon presence/absence data, combining the Glires clade, which consists of the Rodentia and the Lagomorpha, with that of the Euarchonta, a clade consisting of the Scandentia, the Primates and the Dermoptera. The Euarchontoglires probably split from the Laurasiatheria sister group about 85 to 95 million years ago during the Cretaceous. This hypothesis is supported by fossil as well as molecular evidence. to Eutheria[2] is a taxon containing the placental mammals, such as humans. The sister group of Eutheria is Metatheria, which includes marsupials and their extinct relatives. to Theria (pronounced /ˈθɪ.ɹiË.É™/ from the Greek θηÏίον, wild beast) is a subclass of mammals that give birth to live young without using a shelled egg, including both eutherians (placental mammals) and metatherians (marsupials and their ancestors). to Mammals are a class of vertebrate animals characterized by the production of milk in females for the nourishment of young, from mammary glands present on most species and specialized skin glands in monotremes that seep or ooze milk. There is also presence of hair or fur, specialized teeth, three small bones within the ear, the presence of a neocortex region in the brain, endothermic or "warm-blooded" bodies, and, in most cases, the existence of a placenta in the ontogeny.
Although if you look into the facts, it takes just as much if not more faith to believe in evolution than it does intelligent design.
Expand my mind? Go read a book by Zecharia Sitchin. As for thinking I am one of those - you CLEARLY have not paid attention to what I post and say. Perhaps it isn't my mind that needs expansion. Also, no human frame that large would be able to support the weight - it would be physically impossible due to the constraints of our bone design - furthermore the picture came from a worth1000 contest.
Exactly, you find some monkey creatures here and there and draw a map of them and say thats it. Heres a piece of ape. Search for a site and you will find a site that says its a fake and that Oranges dont have vitamin-C, and you will belive it.
The problem with saying that aliens created humans is that it's just a sci-fi explanation of "God created us." I'm not saying that aliens have never visited the earth or that they didn't have contact with ancient civilizations. There are a number of strange facts that suggest some ancient people had advanced knowledge and some of their stories talk about visits by different people from the sky. Still it's hard to believe that aliens created man and then left him alone when they were done with him. Why would they leave the planet if they were already here and using native creatures to work for them? That part of the ET theory doesn't make any sense.
T-Rex was a Veggy!? Were you aware that it has been proven by the Creation Evidence Museum that T-Rex was NOT a meat eater? That's right! They proved it in TWO WAYS... The roots of T-Rex were only 2 inches deep. Had he bit into the hide of another dinosaur he would have lost teeth They cut a tooth in half og a unearthed T-Rex and found in deeply impureated with CHLOROPHYLL! That's right, Chlorophyll is the main substance found in PLANTS not meat! Thats your sciense for you, based on facts wich are improvised, and then you just add whatever you want, (it was a meat eater), maybe cause they found a little dinosaur in him? If the remains are there it must be thrue, now its proven wrong... Evolution is fiction.
We where an experiment, there is an aboriginal village in an island of Indonesia, they have better imune systems. Swedish scientists have gone their to experiment and find out why that is. When they are there they will mingle tech them things, then leave. WHY DIDNT THEY STAY, OR KEEP IN TOUCH? Aliens have no reason to stay, they created us and left.
The problem is that the term "Evolution" is meaningless. It encompasses scientific fact (adaptation) with religion loosely based on science (man and apes share a common ancestor). Asking people if they believe in "Evolution" is like asking someone if they believe in trees and santa claus while not giving them an option to deny one but not the other. Nobody denies that things change. Things changing has nothing to do with intelligent design. Intelligent Design simply states how and where things began. Not what happened after they began. Jakuul: That's a neat picture. You should try comparing all those "ancient" skulls to the skulls of living humans and primates.
A theory isn't something that's just made up. Cell theory is a theory. Are you going to claim that to be a "bull" as well only because it hasn't been "proven"? There's no incontrovertible evidence for your outrageous claims either.