India's government forces use gas and beat people like dogs. No Liberty to Protest

Homebiz you have lied in this thread, and every other thread I have debated with you today.

'Temper Tantrums' oh yes when I tell a guy who slanders me what I honestly feel of him.

So where is that proof of 68,000 UNARMED 'mostly' innocent woman and children being killed? Talk about 'lies'

Opinion is far different than putting something as a fact that is a lie. I will still at times call out opinions, lies when I see them I will call them out every single time. So we still are debating my style and not the substance, gotta love that.

BTW just because I do not call someone on something does not mean anything. Ever think I did not read the thread? I did not know the facts in order to dispute it? There are many reasons one might have for not disputing above them being on my side or not.

BTW agenda's are one thing, be agenda driven all you want, simply use facts, or is that too much to ask?

 

This post is wrong on so many counts that I dont even know how to reply.

 

Yes read it, you troll me and debate on 'how' I debate, not the thread at hand.

 

Sure it wasn't pointed to me, you were all about the thread at hand.

 

Um. I brought up the other thread as an example, you posted in it several times and seem to be at least mildly supportive of the poster. But you are anti-war and identify to some degree with the protesters so it makes a bit of sense. That's fine as long as you don't claim to be a defender of truth, complete with a mask and a cape and everything.

 

The thread was totally different than this thread, yet again start a new thread if you want to 'debate' me about 'me'

That thread had opinions linked to videos, this thread used select quotes and lies linked to an article.

I'm supportive? Even though I am responding to others on something I felt was a BS posted put into the thread, my post had nothing to do with the op.

My posts had nothing to do with the OP, most of them 'but one' had everything to do with mindless bashing of Ron Paul and his supporters.

 

This thread is basically homebiz's response to that thread.

You win, it's ok to pick and choose when to defend honesty.

 

One is posting opinion to video, the other posting select quotes of an article linking to the article, they are totally different.

Ahh yes like you have no problem being dishonest as shown in this very thread.

Again START A NEW THREAD if you feel the need to debate my debating style for the last time.

 

Lets not forget the innocent. Looks unarmed to me.






What is the purple insecticide? Is it poison or water. It depends on which side is telling the truth.

 

BTW unarmed was speaking of the 68,000 unarmed 'mostly' innocent woman and children that were killed in the area 'according to you', not this incident.



Glad to see you coming through with more attempt at distortions.

 

The poster of the other thread is posting opinion as if it were fact that Americans no longer have the right to protest. The poster made no mention of the fact that the police served search warrants. He didn't even entertain the thought that perhaps the protest group was actually in the wrong. He didn't talk about the acts of vandalism perpetrated by the protesters or the possible plans to hurt people.

He posted links to videos of left wing(and other wing) propaganda showing protesters inciting the police by crossing barriers as proof to back up his claims of the U.S. being a police state.

Do you really think it was more honest than homebiz's post? Especially when the poster of the other thread makes post after post of this nature? But you didn't take exception to that thread at all. Is it because you're anti-war and identify with the protesters or does your penchant for defending honesty come and go conveniently and arbitrarily?

If you want to make it about me and you then so be it: The difference between me and you is that I call bullshit regardless on whether or not the bullshit in question coincides with my personal beliefs.

You had a chance to call bullshit on guaharahks post but didn't. Yet, you calling bullshit on this thread was quite predictable.

You're not as agenda-driven as some on this board, but you are indeed agenda-driven.

---- Insert predictable reply about starting a thread to debate your debating style below this line ----

 

Yet again there was no link to an article, video is not an article now is it?

Yet again what was posted was his opinion, not lies and or select quotes from an article as there wasn't one.

Did I say it was 'more honest' no I DID NOT. He however did NOT link to an article, he did not select quote, he did no from what I witnessed post flat out lies such as I caught homebiz in.

Do you like having a hard on trying to debate my debating style? I will make this as simple as possible so even you can understand.

That thread was based off of opinion, linked to videos.
Homebiz select quoted and then lied, linked to an actual article.
One is based off of opinion and video, the other is not. How you can not understand this is simply amazing.

You are not fooling anyone with any intelligence, you have a hard one to try to debate me about my debate style. You did this in a previous thread that browntwn had to finally have closed.

You are as dishonest as they come, a troll to boot. Your entire debate in this thread has been BULLSHIT.

Logic get a life and stop ruining threads to simply debate my debating style. It is simply pathetic to be 100% honest.

Yet again STOP RUINING THREADS WITH YOUR HARD ONE over me.

Yet you are allowing your hate for me to make you make this about me and not the topic at hand, all the while not posting about Homebiz lying about the 68,000 'mostly innocent woman and children who were also unarmed'

Give me a break.

 

You did not catch homebiz in anything. You are trolling logic as hard as you can. 68,00 people were killed and yes most were unarmed, all ?, no, but most.

You are truely one to side with anti-americans and troll. You are not fooling anyone even though you are patting yourself on the back.

 

No, you made it about you, as usual. And I don't hate you, that would be silly. You're just a guy on the internets with inconsistent principles who can't debate issues without creating distractions.

And we both had an equal part in ruining browntwn's thread. I apologized to him for it. And I don't suspect homebiz will object to us having this conversation in this thread. If you do, homebiz, let us know.

 

Homebiz you have been caught in multiple things.

Now it's 'most' were not armed, before you stated 68,000 unarmed people.

Select quotes as well, among other fabrications.

'trolling logic' yeah again you can only parrot what others around you tell you.

Showing you and your flat out lies is not trolling.

 

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=9210373&postcount=44

Lying yet again I see.

I told you multiple times to take it out of that thread, you continued it. You debated me on my debate style, you brought the crap into a thread where it did not belong.

I have asked you multiple times to start a new thread, something I see you are incapable of doing.

I see you can't debate anything, but cry about your red rep you got from me and cry about you not liking the way I debate, all the while showing how truly dishonest you are.

FOR THE LAST TIME either create a new thread or SHUT UP. This thread has nothing to do with you bitching and whining about not liking how I debate.

 

Actually you are baiting logic and myself. You are constantly lying and pushing your anti-American agenda. Try to read and educate yourself.

 

Show me where I have lied Homebiz...

I am not anti American, I am very pro American if you must know.

'educate yourself' lol you have got to be kidding me. That's like a kindergarten who just pissed their pants trying to tell a college professor to go back to school.

Thanks for the laugh!

---
On a serious note, where do you get the following from?

Where does it state that it's insecticide?

 

I haven't once until now mentioned all the cowardly red rep I got from your friends in the browntwn thread. Even the one that went to the javascript forum to red rep me so it would take more points.

I have plenty of rep that I don't have to worry about it. It's not about the rep. It's about getting frustrated in a legitimate debate and then red repping people because they disagree with you.
I hardly ever even green rep people just because I agree with them. I just don't think it's what rep was intended for.

I would like to just so you would stop repeating this over and over, but making a thread all about you is exactly what you want. So I'm just hoping someone else creates it.

 

Ahh but the red rep is the reason you continue to troll me and try to debate the way I debate.

BTW 'my friends' I don't really have many on here, I guess it couldn't be the fact that you were wrong?

Again as proven it had nothing to do with 'disagreeing' and everything to do with putting your nose into a place like a troll, with a comment that wasn't even part of the debate.

Talk about 'dishonesty' you are becoming the poster child.

Actually I would prefer you stop trying to 'debate' me about 'me' but I see you have a hard on for me and will not stop. I would rather threads not get trashed by your obsession over me.

I see you yet again like to take the dishonest route.

Now YET AGAIN how about getting back to the topic at hand, if you only want to debate 'me' then please create a new thread, either that or give up already.