hey, I had this question in mind for a long time. Can I have a answer for it. What is the importance of unique article over spun article in contextual link building. I have seen a lot of people providing spun article service at mere 10$-20$ on 100 blogs saying that you will get 300-400 links. How will this help if 99 blogs are having 50% copied articles? I don't see a benefit in this. Please solve my query on this. thank you,
I try to avoid 100 % copied articles and insist they must be first rewritten with the {phrase|phrase1|phrase2|phrase...} method. It only takes a bit of time with the proper tools and in my opinion the results are much better.
You may see some issues with google's dupe content only counting a fraction of the blogs. I can tell you, however, that one quality article on ezine is better than 10 articles on random blogs.
If spinning is done right I'd say that one unique article can quite easily be turned into 20 articles that would not trip Google's duplicate content filter and could thus be submitted to 20 different article directories or other locations of your choice. But most of those people who do offer spinning and submission services on here do a pretty poor job, I spin my article manually and have someone else submit them for me which is obviously more labour intensive on my part but I can make sure of the article quality this way.
When I spin, I just go for 2 readable and top quality articles, rather than trying to get 100's out of one. I can turn 1 article in to 3 usable ones in less than 10 mins. If I had to squeeze more than that I would end up running into problems/running out of synonyms e.t.c.