Source = Moonbat Society for the Delusional. No one ever said Saddam had anything to do with 9/11. Where on earth did you dream that up?
Was wondering the same. Lots of ties between them, but never saw anything that said saddam had anything directly to do with 9/11. Of course, some people won't even give the credit to the terrorists who did the attacks.
Superb reply as usual Mia but ferret77 is right. You are so hellbent on defending your beloved Republicans and your hero Bush that you flat refuse to accept facts. The US was arming Iraq for years before the Kuwait invasion, stop pretending it didn't happen sir because it did.
tard, 2 of of links might as well be one of my websites, and does the first one washtimes.com actually have anything to do with the washington times?
what a come back! was the US selling arms to saddam at the same times as he was gasing and mass executing his people? Pretty much all sources say yes the US was tard asked if saddam had been killed by clinton if we would have a war on terror
I know, but thanks for saying it anyway. Ferret stated opinions, not facts. There is a difference. His opinion is not fact, nor is it backed by fact. In fact, he did not even seek to list any supporting facts to his statements, because there are none. I think you completely misunderstood what I said. That is not uncommon...
so not only where we arming a shitty dictator, we might even have been arming al queda? wow a even worse !
If you look under the author's name, he writes for the Washington Times...check it out. All he did was ask for proof, thats what I gave.
I'm not even going to touch that one. Someone translate the broken English here for me... I have no idea what he is trying to say now. I sometimes wonder if Ferret just gets so upset that he starts replying faster than his brain can keep up. I can almost picture him banging on the keys, screaming, sweating and swearing... Well, you made some pretty silly claims, then offered nothing to back them up. What do you expect. Is this a rhetorical question? Yes, as I read through the vast list of sources you have provided, I can certainly see that you must be 100% correct. Wait, where are those sources again? WTF? Now we are opening sentences with "tard"? Now if that ain't the pot calling the kettle black. Again, can someone translate this broken English for me? I don't speak rant.
Its not rant, its called "IhateamericasomuchthatIcan'tdoanythingelsewithmylifebutstartdumbsentencesphonics"
actually no, it pretty verifiable saddam gased the kurds in 88, then there was purposed "Prevention of Genocide Act of 1988" that was going to cut off ties with Iraq but regan opposed it and it died. sales of arms and dual use technology continued up to the first gulf war google it
Who are "we?" Were you not in diapers back then? Might have? Allies are allies forever? Blame America first! That's all it's about!
Egads... this moronic thread has hit ten pages. Is any forum on the Internet more susceptible to trolls than we are?
its history, its not easily grabbed from usual news sites http://www.iranchamber.com/history/articles/arming_iraq.php http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ed...es/2005/11/15/senator_kennedy_opposed_saddam/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=us_iraq_80s sites are hokey but if you look up individual events you can verify if they are real or not