I'm really surprised to see this changed. I have a website & I've submitted article about this site. but believe me, when my website drop from search engine that time my article also drop & when my site come back that time article also come back so what is the relation between article page & my website??? Do you have any idea. If i want to rank up my article page then what should I do? Thanks for your reply.
Why don't you give us your URLs (submitted articles AND site page(s) the submitted articles point to)? What you're describing sounds quite logical to me. Google is constantly adding and dropping pages from their index. Chances are good that the submitted articles are falling out of their index. Since the submitted articles are no longer indexed, the links to your site's page that are embedded in the submitted articles no longer count. So your page on your site has lost it's external backs... so your page's rankings will suffer. Then at some point later, Google decides to reindex the old submitted article, causing the links to the page on your site to be counted again... So your page starts ranking again. This is the problem with using article submissions and blog posts for your primary method of building backlinks to your sites. They typically provide a boost for a while but once archived they have very little effect on your rankings. These are not like naturally acquired links which typically remain indexed and therefore counted over MUCH longer periods of time, years... or decades. While a newly submitted article is being linked to on the recent articles page of the submission site, it's being indexed and being passed a little PR. But once it falls off the recent articles page and is only accessible from the archives, it's too far down in the submission site to remain indexed (unless it has acquired other backlinks from other sites while it was on the recent articles page). The same happens w/ blog posts. While the blog posts are on the home page they are indexed and being passed a decent amount of PR. Once they move into the archives, they are less likely to remain in Google's index unless other sites linked to the post while it was being highlighted on the home page.
how could you say to depend on article's site is dangerous?if article's sites are promoting your then that are good , & if Google de indexed your site then its become dangerous how?did not make any logic
I don't think he meant 'dangerous' as it in will get you penalized. I think he meant 'dangerous' as in it's dangerous if it's the only method you're using... and that it's not a long term link building strategy. Blog posting, article submission, forum posting, etc. are all 'ok' methods of getting a temporary boost for new sites that have no other way to attract links. But as I described above, their effectiveness is generally short-lived. You submit an article, you get a nice boost... then a month later your page that the submitted article links to begins to fall back in to the SERPs because it's only backlink (the submitted article) is now only accessible and linked to from the archives... Over time Google typically will deindex the article if it hasn't gotten any backlinks from other sites. At a minimum the archives page that links to it has a much lower PR than the Recent Article page where it appeared for the first few weeks it was on the submission site. To use them as your main method of getting backlinks means you have to continue to do it. It is not a "do it once and reap the rewards forever" type of link building strategy... Links acquired naturally from non-blog, non-article submission, non-forum sites (i.e. just a good ole fashioned website) tend to remain effective because they tend to continue to be linked to from the same spots on the site. They don't move into some archive deep in the site after a month and therefore are deindexed less frequently. The very site structure of blogs, article submission, and forum sites means that the most recent content on the site get the most prominent links, while older posts are only linked to much deeper in the site from less prominent pages. So they are more likely to get deindexed over time. AND because these types of sites are abused by spammers, they are most likely going to be targets of algorithm changes once the abuse reaches a critical mass.