Im noticing something else besides the PR update...

Discussion in 'Google' started by joeychgo, Jul 13, 2006.

  1. joeychgo

    joeychgo Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,368
    Likes Received:
    321
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    255
    #21

    Google has a 'supplemental index' - a secondary index for when they cant find the answer to a search in their real index.


    FYI -- My forumhome, which got its PR 6 this last update, still isnt cached.
     
    joeychgo, Jul 17, 2006 IP
  2. heinlein99

    heinlein99 Peon

    Messages:
    538
    Likes Received:
    11
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #22
    Thanks for the reply. I've since seen the term mentioned in other posts and apparently it's not really news to anyoone.

    My question, then, is: why have two indexes at all? Why bother with having a two-tiered indexing system? Creating some kind of 'index ghetto' is going to really piss off a lot of developers, I think. Or am I looking at this wrong?
     
    heinlein99, Jul 18, 2006 IP
  3. joeychgo

    joeychgo Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,368
    Likes Received:
    321
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    255
    #23
    Since when does google care if we're pissed off?
     
    joeychgo, Jul 18, 2006 IP
  4. jbladeus

    jbladeus Peon

    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #24
    i feel that G have intentionally screwed up their index and cache results like they did with link:. This has been done to discourage link building schemes like coop, lv etc which rely quite a bit on these. But then its my personal opinion. :)
     
    jbladeus, Jul 20, 2006 IP