Dude, if you don't get it by now, there's nothing I or anyone else can do to help you. Let it go. Wow...
I find it ironic that sarcasm does not always contain irony and that irony often is not sarcastic yet you prefer its use rather than the more accurate use of sarcasm.
Had he actually taken the time to read the third line of my post (http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=12719325&postcount=17) he'd have caught the sarcasm without the need of some ironic cliche' or other indication that "sarcasm" was to be inserted. What is truly ironic is that I have to explain something everyone else gets to willyb in nearly every thread here.
It would appear that you missed the irony of my post... Wiki may provide an explanation though: BTW, and back on topic (where are those thread police when one needs them? Off chasing lemmings I suppose...) I have mixed feelings about Obama. He is surrounding himself with advisors that will maintain the status quo, while many of those that voted for him really did desire fundamental change. Politics as usual...