I got banned from SEOChat after making only a few posts but do not know why! Anyone a member there who can find out why as I didn't do anything wrong other than post some advice others see differently or they did not like my way of posting or something. One guy asked about his blog and I suggested his long string of a domain name would work better if he broke up the words making it easier for the se bots to index. Others seemed to think my answer to his question was wrong. Yet I was just going by what I had read in guidelines. I also posted a similar post to one on DP and I think someone thought that perhaps I had just copied and pasted or someting when I had actually written the post from scratch. I love taking the Michael (especially out of myself - I don't like taking myself too seriously LOL) when it comes to posting sometimes, as I like to inject a little humour into things and as many will know it is very easy to say the wrong thing or something that you later learn something new about and then wish you had known at the time (Hence why many lurk and are afraid to post) but that's just my way of learning and not something deserving of getting banned for when you genuinely are planning on contributing with useful info surely. Now I don't mind getting insulted - in fact sometimes its a good thing - I never pukll people up for typos or other mistkes as people are people and all make mistakes but getting banned for very little that is different. I like to have a little fun with my posts and some will not be immediately obvious in their intent as I often have a plan in mind to learn from and also to try to help others learn and this often confuses people who only look at things from one immediate angle but as I say I do this with the best intentions. Any how can anyone please find out exactly why SEOChat decided to ban me? I was only trying to participate in a construtive way that may not have been immediately apperent but nevertheless was my intention!
Hmm interesting he seems a bit "out of the ordinary" (mad-ish) or Wacko as he puts it. I think maybe they just dont like unorthodox approaches or those that have a different approach though it would be interesting to find out for sure