I forgive the US if they elect Dr. Ron Paul

What happened when we left Vietnam?

 

serving your country doing what? peeling potatoes? please, they wouldn't give you a gun you would be more of a danger than your so called "dangerous terrorists".

 

I see.

A Guyan plot hatched 10 years ago.

An internal Iraq (non-US directed) plot.

And a plot stopped by Australians.

Fascinating.

 

The difference is Gtech, you use Hucks stances the candidate you support to ATTACK others on here, calling them 'tearing down America' and 'terrorist supporters' among others.

Of course you are not going to support a candidate 100%, I'd hope to hell you did not. The difference is you use the same stances to attack others, while your own candidate it's just 'a disagreement'

 

Guerilla,

You couldn't be any more further from the truth. But, as I've come to expect, you will sell integrity on a dime for political gain. Not surprising though. Ron Paul doesn't know what "honor" is, and as it's turning out, apparently his supporters do not either.

I do thank you for helping me with that fine point.

 

Ad Hominem Attack

Ad Hominem Attack

You're welcome. Keep the strawman arguments and ad hominem attacks coming. You're in great form today.

 

Thank you! Further illustrating that ron paul supporters have no care for our military or those serving our country.

Apparently you have no idea how the military works, or you wouldn't have made such a stupid comment.

Senior 2009?

 

Straw man argument.

Ad Hominem attack.

Ad Hominem attack.

 

Facts are not biased nor attacks. Some nutter here uses that from time to time. Thought I'd try it out

And thank you, for taking the time to prove my point in my post to fletch. Apparently I'm not the only one noticing your anti-Americanism. I wonder why?

 

Gtech did serve, it does not matter what he did, he as all those who served do deserve some respect for it.

Is he even an RP supporter? Even so, talk about trying to inflict a group mentality on a subject. You're 100x worse than the supposed 'anti Bush' people with your talk about Paul.

I guess every time a Huck supporter states anything against the US, anything remotely bad against a serviceman or woman, that would be ALL HUCK supporters views?..

 

They are realling doing a fine job for your side, aren't they?

I can see you are just beaming with pride for the mujahadeen movement! Who could think that some infidels were so willing to help out your cause?

 

What is the plan for fixing this mess in Iraq then? Where is the solution so I can have a good look at it and see what I think. Are we just going to occupy the place until they get their shit together? If they form a competent government and military can we leave then or do we need to stick around for 50 more years and make sure it lasts? If they suddenly get "stable" tomorrow do we then move to Iran? Or perhaps go back to Afghanistan and stabilize that too?
Seriously if we are going to act empirical and invade a country and topple its government then we need to finish the job right and make it a US territory under military rule... OR GTF OUT and let them sort the mess out. They should have toppled Saddam themselves and if we hadn't trained him so well we could have just black opped his ass out of existence...

 

Straw man argument.

 

So, are all of the anti-American ron paul supporters through supporting the islamist movement for the day? Anymore tearing America down? Anyone else looking to be a willing accomplice?

Thank you all for standing behind, support and defending terrorist causes today. I couldn't have asked for a better platform to illustrate my points. If you hate America and are sympathetic to terrorists, as those who participated today are, ron paul is your candidate.

 

Straw man argument. Ad Hominem Attack.

 

Anti-Americanism.

I am excited to see that you will stand up for yourself, but not your country. It's all part of what I'm looking to illustrate

 

You're welcome. I believe you deserve this platform to express your support for Saddam Hussein and Ansar-al-Islam.

Straw man argument and Ad hominem attack.

 

Straw man argument.

Straw man argument.

 

I have said it before I will say it again.

If I honestly thought, rounding up every suspected terrorist and slaughtering them would work I'd be for it. If I honestly thought forcing every country on the face of the planet to submit to our military to sweep through their country and shoot point blank every terrorist would work I would support it.

I do not support terrorism, I support what I feel is the way to win. I have no sympathy for terrorists, I base my stance on what I feel is the correct method to win, the method I have read many articles, watched many programs of intelligence officials stating is the way to win.

Forcing others to do as we want and slaughtering them only creates more of them, I myself do not want a never ending war. I want to win, sadly I think those on the other side want to win as well, I however feel they are backing a losing strategy. Instead of simply realising it's the strategy is different they attack by saying people like me are pro terrorists, tearing down America, etc, etc.

I have NO sympathy for terrorists, in my sick sadistic mind I'm sure I could come up with more things to do to a terrorist that I'd have no problem with than the war mongers would be for. I however do not even remotely think it's a sound method to win.

When will people wake up and understand logic does not make one 'pro terrorist'

 

And I'm happy to give you that platform.

Are you ashamed of having view points of terrorists and anti-Americans? I do like how you will stand up for yourself (self-serving) but not your country. Can you recall who was making that point?

The narcissism is thick today isn't it? I've seen a dozen or so "This message is hidden because GRIM is on your ignore list."

Is grim holding you to task for tearing America down, or is he upset that others have pointed it out again? Probably the latter, eh?