humanity disgraced in worlds largest democracy India

Or...

• Stop counting posts in P&R (less motivation for the signature sellers)
• Stop letting Googlebot crawl P&R (less motivation for the e-jihadi's)
• Require 100 posts on DP before allowing posting in P&R (reduce trolls considerably)

[video=youtube;y5hHa8_0T0I]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ9V_QFLNto[/video]

 

Your army is the second largest . You're still missing half a million men whit sticks to achieve that .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_troops
Thanks for the largest contributor to the UN Blue Boys , know I know why they fail to notice anything . Like paramilitary groups mass raping entire villages .

 

That doesn't make you any better than others who make grammatical errors.

Maybe you should ban yourself first before discussing a potential ban of Indian's and Paki's with poor English skills.

Nope. India's Army is in-fact extremely competent in handling external threat to India's sovereignty.

Read up European!

Yet another example of ignorance.

If you have nothing useful to debate, you just post crap which you believe is funny.

So, is your country's army better than the Indian Army?

 

Are you sure you need a spell checker? That was an unmistakable mistake. That was a different word altogether.

Sounds somewhat like I said, right?

 

I have already told you the answer wajid why you always ask the same question

 

What does O_0 mean?

 

Were you under the impression that I was unaware that English is not everyone's first language?

You say you have no problem with them debating here, neither do I. The fact is that people come here, rather hypocritically, and bitch and moan about these threads which are absolutely everything but debates.

This section is for debating and intellectual discussions, right? There are too many of these ridiculous threads which comprise of "India has done this..." or "Pakistan has done this...". It really is spoiling the section.

I stand by statement - which has been removed by politically-correct moderators - however probably could have been more specific by stating those who clutter the forum with poor English and non-debatable threads, should be banned. It just so happens that the majority of these people are Indian and Pakistani. Every day threads bashing each other, which no real merit, are made.

Gotta love the "inappropriate post" infraction. I see people posting "fuck muslims/jews", Indians/Pakistanis clearly digging at each other time and time again with clips and photographs of death, name calling like "mongrels", petty squabbling over whose army is best or which country is more moral, yet I'm the inappropriate poster for pointing it out and providing some type of solution. Those of you who have a problem with what I said and preach freedom to debate, why do you keep coming to these threads then? Hypocrites.

I'd also like to point out that it seems perfectly reasonable for Indians to call their neighbours "paki(s)". I'm sure if I used that abbreviation I'd be punished - did you know you can be arrested in my country for using that remark?

Maybe I'll be silenced once again, who knows.

 

Wajid,

I am not trying to convince you, still, I write this to reiterate what we in India know for sure, that India will never attack you or anyone first. In fact, India isn't at all bothered about Pakistan and what it does, as long as your government focuses on its business. Yes, we occasionally get disturbed at news of Pakistan trying to provoke us; see for yourself, how India reacts to it is an open secret known all over the world. After all, why should we attack Pakistan? We have our hands full, we need to deal with the types you showed in the video, grow our economy, build businesses to surpass China's, so on and so forth. Truly, Pakistan isn't our enemy.

If you see at least a shade of truth in this, I guess I can ask you to rest assured. We, the common Indians, don't need you to waste your time in eastern border. Instead, focus on strengthening the Afghanistan border. We are here, we won't let a single Jehadi/Talibani enter from here. Yeh wada raha!

 

may be they should come to ur place and rape them ?
come on dude don't make ridiculous statements and make a mockery of ur self, I am pretty much sure u r an Paki living in EU if ur location is rite, bad happen every where when there's evidence brought before the jury the guilty are punished.

we are not like other nations, who would rather prefer to hide their bad doings, our media is daring enough to show negative impacts

we are indeed proud to lend an army for the UN for its peace keeping, so better stop making a fun of urself

peace!!!

 

You sounded as if you own this forum. Nevertheless, you apparently look frustrated but I am not complaining. The kind of posts that frustrate you also irritate me but it's all about leaning to ignore them which helps to keep mind a bit more fresher. Don't you agree? The forum owners have a few sets of rules and you appeared with your demand to pressurize the owners to change them. I think it's better if we left them alone to do their jobs the best way they have known.

Okay, did I try to silence you? I hope not.

 

Which is pretty silly, considering that it was quoted in several other posts which are still here.

Europeans and Americans seem to be held to a higher standard.

Weird... so you have to use the entire word or risk arrest by the PC police? Fascinating! A War on Abbreviations!

Can you still call Americans "Yank's", or do you risk jail for not saying "Yankee."

Can you call Australians "Aussies" without risking a trip to the hoosegow?

Is "Frogs" still OK? How about "Jerry's"? "Micks?" "Kiwi's?" What of "Brits" and "Limeys?"

Is this yet another case of preferential treatment for terrorists?

Bans don't hurt, they just give us extra time to make money.

 

If you fulfill your promise (We are here, we won't let a single Jehadi/Talibani enter from here)
that can help us to defeat terrorists attacking us from Afghan Border but the problem is
terrorists enter into India putting salt in India Navy as 26/11 that spreads a smell of war from both side
Fulfill the Promise do not let a single terrorist enter into India and i Promise you a peaceful Asia

 

God forbid I give some sort of feedback, suggestion or critique.

We shouldn't have to ignore them. That's so very silly. There are many rules, not a few, and so it's only sensible that those who do not use the P&R forum properly shouldn't post here. You write very sensitively, what's this bollocks about "pressurising"? I made a very plain statement. Did I demand anything? No.

Leaving the moderators to do as they wish means that you can use vulgar words to describe people of certain ethnicities or nationalities, but make a comment which generalises, good god you're for it.

Did I say you did?

Will, what's silly about my statement? I'm aware there are several quotations.

I kid you not about the thought police though. "Paki" is a highly forbidden word, while nearly all other abbreviations aren't, here in Airstrip-1.

 

I concede that time and again India has moved her army to her Pakistan border but you will never find an occasion when it did upon terror/jehadi provocation. Never will there be a war for reasons like terror attacks. Indian army is too big to get distracted by such things. Hope you remember our only reaction to 26/11 was requesting to deport a few jehadis to India and voice samples of other few that are living there.

There is hardly any instance of intrusion from this side, or is there any? Although I won't go as far as claiming India as free of jehadi outfits, the point I am trying to make is they are focused on India.
http://news.rediff.com/report/2010/sep/08/pune-blast-suspects-speak-about-new-terror-outfit.htm
http://news.rediff.com/slide-show/2...une-blast-case-cracked-2-let-men-arrested.htm

 

A suggestion to ban two whole communities because a few posts irritated you? Wake up, you have a long way to go before you grow up.

 

It's not my fault these threads are created only by those from these particular communities.

 

So you feel urged to subscribe or participate in there? Just ignore them.

 

The point I meant to make was that the moderators were silly to delete a post and leave a bunch of posts which quoted it. The net effect was zero.

I don't like my individual rights violated, and a lot of other people think just the same as I do. I'd be surprised if the banning of the word "Paki" didn't cause it to be used more -- and in more creative ways.

The opposite is true also. You could write articles about ____stan while specifically not calling it by it's name. In one paragraph you could define it's latitude and longitude, in another you could define it by it's bordering nations, in a third you could refer to it by pointing out it's status as a leading non-Arabic source for global terrorism, in a fourth you might describe it as "that place where the flood happened recently." Idiotic rules were means to be lampooned.

 

Calling Pakistani's Paki is OKAY, but calling Indians or other Asians Paki is considered racism. So obviously.

 

Helvetti, the 'authorities' here think differently. The word, regardless of context or target subject, is an arrestable offence. Even if it is racist to generalise West Asians as 'pakis'', which is debatable, would you agree that racism shouldn't be illegal? We also have many other 'discrimination' laws here.