1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Human is non-meateater....???????

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by suraj78, Apr 8, 2010.

  1. #1
    The most common argument is that the humans is non-meateater or meat-eater, these are some dissimilarities between non-meateaters and meat-eaters

    1. The non-meateaters’ offspring have their eyes open at the time of birth, like our children have, while the meat-eaters’ offsprings have their eyes closed at the time of birth.

    2. The non-meateaters drink water by their lips, like we do, while the meat-eaters drink by their tongue.

    3. Meat-eaters’ stomach is highly acidic to digest meat easily; stomach of non-meat-eaters and man is alkaline to digest carbohydrates easily.

    4. Like this the saliva of non-meat-eaters and man is alkaline, while that of the meat-eaters is acidic.

    5. Structure of teeth of man is similar to that of the non-meateaters. They are primarily flat molars to bite and grind the plant food, but are different from the long canines of meat-eaters meant for catching and killing the pray, and biting and tearing the flesh

    6. Jaws of meat-eaters open wide to capture and grab the prey, but don’t move sideway, however, the jaws of non-meateaters, and also man, don’t open wide enough but moves sideways to grind the plant food.
    SEMrush
    7. meat-eaters have long and sharp claws; non-meateaters and man have no claws.

    8. Meat-eaters have a strong sense of smell and their eyes can see in darkness too for catching the prey. Man and non-meateaters have relatively weaker sense of smell and sight.

    9. Meat-eaters’ voice has generally a heavy accent and unpleasant. The voice of man and non-meateaters bears a lighter accent.

    10. last but most acceptable example:

    Let us imagine two small children (say, about 2 years in age). If the first child given an apple and second one a small rabbit, we wonder what would the children do once they are hungry. Assuming that the children had never seen an apple or a rabbit in past, respectively. The first may being to eat the apple after while. The question is: what would the second child do with the rabbit. Let us assume that the rabbit is tied by means of string such that the child can get very close to the rabbit and after some time when mutual trust and love develops, he can even touch it. Once he too is hungry, he may ask for food or would he ask for the rabbit to be killed and cooked for his meal. Even if he belongs to a family of meat-eater parents.

    These all examples prove that human is non-meateater.
     
    suraj78, Apr 8, 2010 IP
    SEMrush
  2. suraj78

    suraj78 Peon

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Hey meat-eaters, defend yourself.
     
    suraj78, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  3. Warner

    Warner Active Member

    Messages:
    1,085
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    78
    #3
    Meat brings us very useful albumen - it is necessary for strong health asnd healthy weight! It is obvious that vegetarians suffer from adiposity 2 times more often than those who eat meat regularly. It is useful to eat meat not often than 2 times a week.
     
    Warner, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  4. Ziggy

    Ziggy Active Member

    Messages:
    276
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #4
    suraj78 Are you Indian?
     
    Ziggy, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  5. suraj78

    suraj78 Peon

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    But what is your opinion that so for our benefit we have to kill innocent animals huh?
     
    suraj78, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  6. Project Mobius

    Project Mobius Peon

    Messages:
    10,526
    Likes Received:
    170
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    yes, so deal with it
     
    Project Mobius, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  7. suraj78

    suraj78 Peon

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    Yes I am. why?
     
    suraj78, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  8. suraj78

    suraj78 Peon

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Hmm, but it is indication of human has a good brain?
     
    suraj78, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  9. medoholic

    medoholic Guest

    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    i agree with suraj completely...human is a non meat eater...have u seen any meat eater cook meat before eating....only humans do it. were they meant to be non vegetarians they cud have eaten it raw tooo!!!
     
    medoholic, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  10. suraj78

    suraj78 Peon

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    Yeah you are right. :)
     
    suraj78, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  11. suman817

    suman817 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,777
    Likes Received:
    378
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    175
    #11
    What is your opinion to kill innocent plants for our benefit? They are also alive! They also feel pain. We cannot hear them! Animals need to kill for being alive.
     
    suman817, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  12. Project Mobius

    Project Mobius Peon

    Messages:
    10,526
    Likes Received:
    170
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    i don't think that question makes any sense at all
     
    Project Mobius, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  13. ValDeV

    ValDeV Member

    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    #13
    If we were not meateaters we wouldn't be able to digest any meat, it would be near poison for us.

    Also the human jaw is very flexible, infact I can fit an entire apple in my mouth (harhar).

    In the past humans needed to eat meat for protein, go 100 years back and try to find a protein substitute thats plentiful (because us humans need ALOT of it).

    All of your theories are limited, most animals drink by tongue even non meateaters, most animals are born with their eyes closed, we have K9 teeth thats meant to eat meat, not all meat eaters have claws what about sharks lol.

    Go read a book and enjoy a steak.
     
    ValDeV, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  14. suraj78

    suraj78 Peon

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    Many scientists proved that after the death of animal some types of chemical reactions takes place in the body. And these chemicals are
    harmful for us.

    Can u please give some examples of the vegetarian animals that drink with tongue and born with closed eyes.
     
    suraj78, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  15. suraj78

    suraj78 Peon

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    Why not Human has a superior brain than other animals, but why he is ignoring the truth.
     
    suraj78, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  16. suraj78

    suraj78 Peon

    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    Plants do exhibit certain features of life and may have life in some sense but are not living beings like humans or animals. They are stationary, they do not have feelings like a living being, and they remain alive even if a major portion of a tree is broken/cut apart.

    According to the ancient Vedic literature, a living being to be called so-called must have the following 6 characteristics of life none of which is found in plants:

    1. Ability to feel pleasure
    2. Ability to feel pain
    3. Desire
    4. Jealousy
    5. Effort
    6. Knowledge

    Also, soul does not reside in a Plant in accordance with the Law of karma to bear the rewards of its actions or karma.

    Plants therefore do not have life in the strict sense of the term, they are not living beings, they do not have a soul and therefore they are distinctly different than animals and humans and therefore eating plants is not killing a living being or a life. Eating plants is Ok, but killing animals and eating them is NOT OK. In fact eating even dead animals is not Ok due to health and ethical reasons.

    There could be an argument that Scientists believe that Plants have life since they grow over time, consume certain gases from the atmosphere and also consume water, fertilizers, sunlight etc and can also reproduce and some even believe that they can react to things like Music also.

    No one disagrees with most of the above argument except that these features in plants do not necessarily establish the existence of life in them. For example, the fact that Railway engine consumes Electricity or coal and moves fast to carry us around does not mean that there is life in the Railway Engine. Rivers, Mountains and Oceans display a lot of activity, movement and creations but that does not mean they have life; precisely because they do not have any or all the six features of life mentioned above or the soul in them. Absence of soul makes them inert objects and nothing else can make them like a living being. In fact Plants grow or consume gases and reproduce due to Physical, Chemical and bio- logical reactions something so well designed by nature to aid and assist human and animal life.

    Regarding Scientific view of life in Plants, it's relevant to understand that Science knows about Matter only not about Spirit. Matter and Spirit are two different specialties. Questions such as existence of Life or not, existence of God or not fall under the realm of Spirit or Spirituality, not Science. Asking Scientists a question concerning spirituality will be like asking an English language teacher a question relating to space technology. To sum up, trying to club plants with meat, fish and eggs lead us to no choice of any kind of food, a scenario of either eat everything you see or eat nothing makes no sense at all. In fact the whole argument about plants being similar to animals is just a distraction and an attempt to justify meat eating and cruelty against innocent animals. Nature/God has designed human body and this universe so perfectly that all humans love and like plant foods without exception and they are grown or possible to grow abundantly and cheaply to feed entire man kind rich or poor.

    The true human ingenuity is in creating new innovative preparations from grains, milk, fruits, vegetable and other produce of vegetable kingdom such as spices, herbs etc. There is no ingenuity in consuming meat, its expensive to produce and extremely harmful for the environment as evidenced in the 2007 United Nations report on Climate Change and must be eliminated from human diet.

    Source: http://pavf.org/topics/topics4.php
     
    suraj78, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  17. ValDeV

    ValDeV Member

    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    #17
    Theres no reason to even reply to this, she obviously had no idea what shes talking about.
     
    ValDeV, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  18. Project Mobius

    Project Mobius Peon

    Messages:
    10,526
    Likes Received:
    170
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    how did you know she's really a she? we reply as much as we want, are you the forum police?
     
    Project Mobius, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  19. Chrissy17

    Chrissy17 Peon

    Messages:
    561
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    Plant products are eaten after the plant has completed its life cycle. Harvesting grains and pulses is done when the plant starts to dry up after completing its life cycle. If fruit is not harvested from trees it naturally falls to the ground; the trees aren't cut down to harvest fruit.

    But at the same time meat from seafood is okay. Fish or prawns eaten once a week is good enough. We could definitely reduce our consumption of red meat though....it comes with too many health risks.
     
    Chrissy17, Apr 8, 2010 IP
  20. sunsunny

    sunsunny Peon

    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    Yaa its better to reduce the amount of meat in daily diets. It will be profitable for us as well as for that animals also. :)
     
    sunsunny, Apr 9, 2010 IP