Huckabee Lies About His Iran NIE Cluelessness, Botches Timeline Again http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/31/huckabee-nie-again/ Huckabee Lies again: Said he supported the surge when Romney didn't http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1949298/posts http://www.democrats.com/huckabee-lies-about-cross The Lies of Mike Huckabee http://truthbeltbuckled.blogspot.com/2007/12/lies-of-mike-huckabee.html "The other lie, which should have been included, was that Huckabee didn't know Alan was running for president. (The Cavuto interview after the Iowa debate) http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,316704,00.html CAVUTO: This was a weird debate, Governor. Alan Keyes was there. I don't — I don't — is he running for president? HUCKABEE: Well, apparently, he is. I was somewhat surprised when I walked out on the stage and I saw the podium for him, because he has not participated in the others. And I don't know that I have seen him campaigning in any of the states, but he was here. CAVUTO: All right. Do you know who invited him? HUCKABEE: No, I don't. I mean, obviously, the debates are in the charge of the newspaper and the local Iowa public television." HUCKABEE LIES ABOUT RAPIST PAROLE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-VSREyq3Uo Huckabee Lies about Tax Hikes http://www.buzzle.com/articles/huckabee-lies-about-tax-hikes.html Mike Huckabee lies about having a theology degree http://www.bentcorner.com/2007/12/16/mike-huckabee-lies-about-having-a-theology-degree/
I'll give him a pass on the 'timeline' myself. Anyone, under the pressure is gonig to get little things off. If he did he intentionally it's a different story, I however will simply think it was unintentional. Who knows, more than likely it was not and was simply to show he didn't have time. How do we know that though? No matter what, he didn't read it, there are plenty of other lies and flip flops he has done. So many in fact I don't think DP would have enough room on their servers to list them all
I've 'skimmed' that story, I will hoestly give it a good open reading later. So far I see more of the same old crap, nothing trully new. Hell even the author of that article says.
Try again bud, keeping digging..the only thing you are digging is your own hole with BS smear articles that are fact-less, baseless and written by such characters
I'm not going to get into the smear game with GTech. Even though I have a large bookmark folder full of Huckabee garbage, you'll find I have started few threads on that candidate. Attacking a candidate is a sign of legitimacy. No one attacks a Tom Tancredo or a Mike Gravel. When GTech comes after Paul, it's either because he fears his chances, or he wants to incite a response for his own pleasure. Both are functions of lower brain thinking, and in the interest of helping GTech be all that he can be, I won't participate in that.