HTML5 is an advanced version of HTML. The major difference is that html5 support audio and video files whereas HTML cannot support.
HTML5 is advanced version of HTML. also having alot of new tags like audio, video, time, header, navigation, section, article, aside, and footer etc.
HTML5 is the fifth implementation of HTML and defines an HTML syntax that is compatible with HTML4 and XHTML1 documents published on the Web, but is not compatible with the more esoteric SGML features of HTML4, such as processing instructions and shorthand markup as these are not supported by most user agents. Documents using the HTML syntax are almost always served with the text/html media type. HTML5 does support for media like video and audio tags better. HTML5 also defines detailed parsing rules (including "error handling") for this syntax which are largely compatible with popular implementations. User agents must use these rules for resources that have the text/html media type.
Hi @riyadhworks , HTML5 is the latest iteration of the HTML which allows easier use of elements for different animations, multimedia and complicated applications. We previously covered the basics of HTML5 in our blog, and you can visit it here if you are interested: http://weboutsourcing-gateway.com/blog/2013/12/web-development-basic-concepts-of-html5/
HTML 5 is a new standard of the HTML. Here you can use new elements, new attributes, animation and develop the applications as well.
I've been avoiding this thread, partly out of not wanting to sound like a broken record, partly out of the blind hope someone might actually do something more than a ignorant one-sentence wonder-post that doesn't actually tell the OP anything useful. But as this sits here and festers in ignorance, with each post being dumber than the one before it, I find myself needing to act. In particular people throwing around words like "advanced" without saying what's so advanced about it, particularly when to be brutally frank it's the exact opposite... and if people would take a few moments to rub a few brain cells together and extract their heads from 1997's backside they'd realize it. Whenever someone calls HTML 5 "advanced" or "the future" or "a new standard" I cannot help but say "Really? looks like the worst of 1997 to me!" The alleged "specification" known as HTML 5 is nothing more than an attempt to undo all the progress of the past decade and a half, reintroducing old redundancies, creating new redundancies, and promoting vendor lock-in. It's target audience quite literally seems to be all the dipshits who until recently were sleazing out HTML 3.2 and slapping 4 tranny on it. Today they get to wrap 5 lip-service around it and continue to crap out the same old outdated halfwit code we've been trying to get people to stop writing for a decade or more! The new allegedly semantic structural tags are nothign more than pointless redundancies. SECTION, NAV and ARTICLE for example are redundant to numbered headings and horizontal rules. AUDIO and VIDEO are redundant to OBJECT and there was NO legitimate reason for their creation other than to allow the browser makers to dictate what data formats we're allowed to use. I call that vendor lock-in! Other elements like PROGRESS or CANVAS are useless without scripting, in which case they have NO MALFING BUSINESS in a markup specification in the first damned place!... the new form attributes seem to have been designed to satiate PSD jockey's need to piss all over accessibility with idiotic false simplicity like 'placeholder'. Of the entire specification there are only one or two actually useful bits like MANIFEST. All the 'cool stuff' people call HTML 5 in fact has jack **** to do with HTML, and are either javascript or CSS -- and news flash, you can use those HTML 4.01 STRICT just FINE!!! You don't have to look any further than the garbage HTML 5 has spawned like Blueprint or Bootstrap which piss all over accessibility, make sites harder to develop and maintain, but because people are TOLD it's easier or more advanced, they stop thinking and swallow the hepatitus infected manure like they were following Pam Anderson around with a ice cream cone. Hmm... SECTION and NAV; Two tags, one cup? Normally I would say I cannot fathom how anyone is DUMB ENOUGH to see anything remotely resembling merit in HTML 5 -- however since the vast majority of people sleazing out websites any old way with their fat bloated idiotic 'frameworks', halfwit presentational HTML 3.2 masquerading around under modern doctypes, with little if anyone remotely understanding semantic markup, the advantages of separation of presentation from content, much less the very notion of the entire reason HTML even exists in the first place -- It really isn't too hard to figure out why most people don't know enough to offer an opinion on if HTML 5 offers any sort of real world improvements. Which is why it's real purpose seems to be for authors to slap a new title on their decade old books, professional lecturers to put buns in seats to charge money as they run their mouths on topics they aren't qualified to flap their gums about, and a new sick buzzword for sleazeball scam artists to prey upon the ignorance of the average person with just like they did with "Web 2.0" and "SEO".
Not with standing the semantic train-wreck you just nailed that shit. Well stated as usual. And WTF is Tim Berners Lee thinking. The rubes in Hollywood have zero business ramming stuffed up legislation down our throats let alone dicking with web standards.(slightly off topic) https://www.techdirt.com/articles/2...-html5-what-is-tim-berners-lee-thinking.shtml Nigel
Honestly that's one of the few moves that makes any sense; and it's not like it isn't optional. You don't want DRM content, don't use it... but for LEGITIMATE content delivery systems like Hulu or Netflix they weren't going to touch VIDEO or AUDIO without DRM on ANY platform. It's a legitimate concern for publishers of content -- and one of those places where the free-tards abuse the word freedom for their own dirty hippy agendas instead of applying rational thought to it. Though again, the mere existence of those two tags is idiotic bullshit since they just re-introduce redundancies OBJECT was created to get rid of... but then I'd like to see OBJECT replace IMG like was originally intended, that way we could maybe deploy more efficient image encodings like JPEG2000? The whole handling of non-text content in HTML 5 is just bull -- and for all the talk about 'not having plugins crash the browser' what they really boil down to is a way for browser makers to tell us what codec/container combinations we can and cannot use; and the only reason for that is Apple's sour grapes over losing the last format wars and your free-tard lossless-tard bullshit about how great OGG is... It's still called vendor lock-in. (you know, crApple's bread and butter?) ... and again, there's NO legitimate reason that one simple if or switch statement couldn't have been added for one simple attibute on OBJECT instead of making a new tag for NOTHING.
Hey look, another pointless one sentence wonder that doesn't say anything useful, and in fact posted outright 100% gibberish. Did I forget to mention that in my somewhat medium sized post? "Because all the code are put into the coding area" -- What the **** does that even MEAN?!? Englisc, mōdor wyrter! Gedōn ēow cweþan hit!?! Does a nice job of proving EXACTLY who HTML 5's target audience is though!
Hey look, another halfwit. There isn't even such a thing as HTML 4.08, the latest iteration was 4.01 ... wow, is this topic like a magnet for gibberish or something?
Html5 is Updated version of Html. There are some additional tags in HTML5. Html5 is very useful for mobile application and responsive web design. HTML5 introduced some new tags for example header, footer, aside, section, footer, section. article, vidoe, audio, nav etc.