Yes, we can see. The conclusion that "Unknown" and "Atheist" are synonyms is ridiculous, no matter how many times you post it. Atheists know what their religion is.
But that doesn't mean that just because the inmates who didn't say or didn't care when asked for their religious denomination are already Atheists. They are merely presumed to be so but holds no concrete evidence that they are indeed Atheists. Would I be instantly labeled as an Atheist just because I didn't say anything about my religion even if I do have a religion?
I think the message was "God has stricken the eyes of the unbelievers; that's why Atheists wear eye glasses and god-fearing religious fundamentalists don't."
Does not knowing what someones religion is, or them refusing to tell you what it is, make them an atheist? - yes or no? Answer my question. (second time of asking)
That the three examples are leading to the same destination they all fail to understand.....and good riddance to them, if only they would just take themselves.
Religious fanatics give weaponry a bad name. I suppose I'm atheist but you won't find someone more supportive of the Right to bear arms. Breeze, from your posts I had the impression you weren't a deist. Care to elaborate on your faith?
An Edenist - The Garden is the physical presence of God. Church of Amageddon. Armageddon - The triumph of Evil. Amageddon - The triumph of Good, the conclusion for remittance. The end will be decided by one or the other for the final Judgment. BRUm, the short story - The Garden of Eden and the expulsion is the only message from the Creator with relevance for mankind. From a gift to earned sustenance, no sin implied but understood in need for conquering for remittance to the everlasting.
Well that's very interesting. The Church of Armageddon you say? I've never heard of that before, although there was this church that worshipped an undetonated atomic bomb in the game Fallout III I'll have to read up on that.
Breeze is in the fortunate position of rejecting entirely christianity while lifting one aspect of it - the garden of eden - wholesale. It's kind of like a pick-and-mix, make it up as you go along kind of religion. Which obviously makes about as much sense as rejecting hinduism just before claiming to be a "vishnuist".
The media is under control of mostly jews and some christians. They say what you want and they earn that way. If you really think that we are a terrorist nation then we got enough power to invade every single country through war and blow up the houses of people. Even governement of US can not resist our attacks then. But did some thing like this happen? The answer is no. Well thats because we aren't terrorists. You don't got any prove that the gunners are Muslims. I can photoshop your picture and make some horns on your head. But in the reality your head will be the same before.
are you saying the media made up a story about a man having his hand cut off by savages for using the name Mohammed?
Yes. Ofcourse I'm saying that media has made up stories. Even if Usama is a bad guy, which I won't believe until I get a valid proof, it doesn't effects Islam. Because then, he won't be counted as a Muslim according to the teachings of Hazrat Muhammed(S.A.W.). Hitler was a christian who killed the most people but is he counted as one of the Christians by the true ones?
You are just denying reality. There is no hope that anything even resembling a rational argument is going to be formulated in your brain. You might as well stand there with your fingers in your ears shouting "la la la". The only reason you are denying these obviously disgusting crimes is because they were crimes committed by muslims. It seems there is abomination that will prevent one muslims defending another. Even your prophet is a child rapist, what do you think about grown men who have sex with children? Go on, defend it, you know you have to.
Allah and Prophet Muhammad(SAW) have declared sex with one's own child a great sin. I'm saying again. Give me one valid proof that Usama is a terroist. Don't got even one?
So you can only molest other people's children? Classic. You won't accept any evidence offered, so we'll not waste our time with you.
`So you can only molest other people's children? ` Thats zina. Its also a great sin and prohibited in Islam. `You won't accept any evidence offered, so we'll not waste our time with you. ` Thats a lame excuse. See! The media shows you what you guys want to see.
So you're saying it was wrong of Muhammad to masturbate by rubbing his penis through Aisha's thighs when she was six years old and vaginally penetrating her when she was nine years old?