How to kill supplementals?

Discussion in 'Site & Server Administration' started by Mario, Oct 22, 2005.

  1. #1
    Lots of links ya ya, deep links ya ya, well is there any other secret to getting lots of co-op weight aka non-supplemental page indexing?
     
    Mario, Oct 22, 2005 IP
  2. GuyFromChicago

    GuyFromChicago Permanent Peon

    Messages:
    6,728
    Likes Received:
    529
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Have pages with actual unique content.
     
    GuyFromChicago, Oct 22, 2005 IP
  3. HN Will

    HN Will Guest

    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    give this a read, too. If you have time.

    http://www.google.com/webmasters/guidelines.html
     
    HN Will, Oct 22, 2005 IP
  4. aeiouy

    aeiouy Peon

    Messages:
    2,876
    Likes Received:
    275
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    If you have existing pages showing up as supplemental, it is likely they are duplicates of something.. If it is on your site.. then working on making sure you have unique title and content helps a lot.

    I know I have pulled existing pages out of supplemental status by just making a few minor modifications.
     
    aeiouy, Oct 22, 2005 IP
  5. compar

    compar Peon

    Messages:
    2,705
    Likes Received:
    169
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    I'm sorry to ask the dumb question, but what the f**k is a supplemental?
     
    compar, Oct 22, 2005 IP
  6. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #6
    Compar, they are referring to Google's Supplementary Index (supplementary search results listings).

    That's actually not true, or not necessarily true. It's not necessarily a sign of lesser ranking but often more a reflection of the type of site (e.g., dynamic with several variables so the page may change from one viewing to another).

    http://www.google.com/intl/en/webmasters/faq.html#label

     
    minstrel, Oct 22, 2005 IP
  7. compar

    compar Peon

    Messages:
    2,705
    Likes Received:
    169
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    Thank you for that explanation. Is it possible to get search results from this supplemental index? And if so how?
     
    compar, Oct 22, 2005 IP
  8. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #8
    Pages from the supplemental index are included automatically in Google's search results if they are relevant to the search. You don't have to do anything special to retrieve them.

    Of course, now when I try to post an example from Google I can't find one :eek:

    You used to see items labeled as Supplemental in Google - one of the things that distinguishes them is they're not cached.

    I just tried a few examples that I would have thought would yield supplemental results and I'm not seeing that label anymore. Maybe Google has discontinued the practice of specifically labeling them as being drawn from the Supplemental Index?
     
    minstrel, Oct 22, 2005 IP
  9. compar

    compar Peon

    Messages:
    2,705
    Likes Received:
    169
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    Are they marked or identified as being "supplemental"? And if they are delivered as part of a normal search why does any one want to "kill" them?
     
    compar, Oct 22, 2005 IP
    The Webmaster likes this.
  10. The Webmaster

    The Webmaster IdeasOfOne

    Messages:
    9,516
    Likes Received:
    718
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #10
    It is automated process, when you search for anykeyword Google automatically fetch the suppliment results from its suppliment index. the results are labled as Supplemental Result.


    Not to worry Dr. here it is -
    [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

    The Webmaster, Oct 22, 2005 IP
    wrmineo likes this.
  11. Design Agent

    Design Agent Peon

    Messages:
    3,061
    Likes Received:
    154
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    Supplemental results arent counted on the api though..
     
    Design Agent, Oct 22, 2005 IP
  12. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #12
    Thanks, Webmaster! I tried about 6 searches and couldn't find a single example to use! :eek:

    See above.

    (1) There is no good reason - I think it's reflecting a misunderstanding of what supplemental results actually are.
    (2) According to Google, there is no way for the webmaster to do this anyway. Google selects the index - not the webmaster.
     
    minstrel, Oct 22, 2005 IP
  13. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #13
    What do you mean by that and on what basis is the statement made?
     
    minstrel, Oct 22, 2005 IP
  14. Design Agent

    Design Agent Peon

    Messages:
    3,061
    Likes Received:
    154
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    You'll have to doulble check this but from what I remember:
    1. Supplemental results dont count towards the coop (i have a site with 50,000 pages in G. but the Kwt + coop count it as about 2500)
    2. Supplemental results are used to supply results on G usually when there are not alot of results to return for a search term.

    As I said, double check, but I think so
     
    Design Agent, Oct 22, 2005 IP
  15. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #15
    I don't know if this is true or not - it would be news to me if it is true but I'd be interested in a definitive answer.

    I think this is incorrect. According to Google, it's more about being able to include pages in the index that meet less stringent criteria and usually have less detail when listed as a search result. See my quote from Google above.
     
    minstrel, Oct 22, 2005 IP
  16. Design Agent

    Design Agent Peon

    Messages:
    3,061
    Likes Received:
    154
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16
    Thats true of course, but you dont really see supplemental results on any competitive terms, hence they are there to supplement the main index on search terms with less results too.


    Edit* coop http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=25560&page=2
     
    Design Agent, Oct 22, 2005 IP
  17. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #17
    Note the date on that thread (mid-2004).

    When Supplemental results first started appearing, there were all sorts of theories about what they were and what they meant. One that I recall was that pages or even sites about to be dropped from the index were first placed in the supplemental index.

    If that was ever true (doubtful), I think it's clear that it's not true now. Again, see Google's comments on what Supplemental listings mean quoted above.
     
    minstrel, Oct 22, 2005 IP
  18. wrmineo

    wrmineo Peon

    Messages:
    3,087
    Likes Received:
    379
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    Oh Minstrel, you took all the fun away from everyone speculating and throwing out answers that were off target ... gosh, a few minutes of research and you killed all of the fun people were having coming up with the answers. :D

    It's amazing that there are definitely places where Google does not give us definitive answers where speculation is appropriate and experiences of others very helpful .... But this is a great case where the answer is given to us by Google and it merely took a few seconds of Minstrel's time to provide it.

    All together now .... "Thank you, Minstrel." Better yet, click on the pretty picture [​IMG] is his post and tell him yourself.

    Thanks for being the voice of reason yet again David.
     
    wrmineo, Oct 22, 2005 IP
    The Webmaster likes this.
  19. Design Agent

    Design Agent Peon

    Messages:
    3,061
    Likes Received:
    154
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    Design Agent, Oct 22, 2005 IP
    wrmineo likes this.
  20. GuyFromChicago

    GuyFromChicago Permanent Peon

    Messages:
    6,728
    Likes Received:
    529
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    Granted it's only one site....but I have a AWS based site that's 100% in the sup index and the api shows 7,000+ pages. Coop weight is about 20K if my memory is correct.
     
    GuyFromChicago, Oct 24, 2005 IP