Hello all DP'rs.. Just share how to get backlink form wikipedia.. here this... inurl:"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk" "keyword" Put thats on search engine (google) "keyword" you need than edit all source from goole. Thats also good if you take all on page one.. Okay.. Keep blogging.. Chear
Thanks friend. The information is unique for me. just I checked it, and let me go in depth. Have a wonderful day.
I have made one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Keyword_stuffing#Use_other_than_for_search_engines here but i am not sure that it will last!!! I think that wikipedia will delete it
All People also change it.. find anything keyword but not popular keyword.. may thats could be save from anyone..
This will not work because wikipedia uses nofollow. And in most cases editors/admins will see what you are doing and either ban you or at the very least black list your domain. FFMG
Maybe, but the link has a rel="nofollow", so you are getting _nothing_ from it. See also, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_pages_not_indexed_by_Google. FFMG
this is not useful at all, because wiki links are nofollow attribute, secondly its not good to spam a free project like wikipedia.
Hey, it's still spelt wrong. Are you talking from actual experience? A lot of people are starting to beleive that the nofollow attribute is being ignored by Google. Also, please think a little before posting links to sources which are clearly inaccurate. If the talk pages were not being indexed then the Google query given in the first post wouldn't be bringing back any search results now would it?
That's what Google itself says. http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=96569 Please try and remain civil, what query given in the first post? If I look at the post written by Avelina none of the text seem to be indexed, (not that I could find). You can try and search for parts of the wiki talk page entry and it does not appear. What "Google query given in the first post..." are you talking about? FFMG
The key point being "In general" which is as yet undefined. I was civil, I said please and I didn't say anything personally offensive towards you. The query that I was talking about in the first post is this, where keyword is an actual keyword: inurl:"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk" "keyword" Code (markup): If the Talk pages were not indexed then Google would not return any results at all. Furthermore, the link that you posted: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_pages_not_indexed_by_Google If you read through the content it says that this is a defunct project, it is categorized as such and it goes on to state that it was only implemented on the German version. As to the query you provided showing that you were unable to find the post that Avelina made within Google's index. Google last cached the page in question on the 15th of April. They are unlikely to revist a page which hasn't been modified since 2008 on a very frequent basis therefore searching by using the content that was added a couple of days ago is not going to find the page until Google does come back and index it again. However, if you search using the content that was on the page prior to Avelina's entry, you can clearly see that the page exists and is included in the results. Providing that Avelina's entry remains on the page (e.g. doesn't get deleted by spam killers) then once Google has reindexed the page you will be able to find it using the query that you were trying.
Hum, I see what you mean now. I was more thinking of a general query rather than an 'inurl' one. But, if Google says that, "In general", they don't follow those links, I take it that they don't follow it unless it is a very special case. I very much doubt that they would have such a special case for wikipedia talk pages. FFMG
Well this is the problem, "we" as in you, me or the general webmaster out there just don't know. How do they classify whats worthy and what isn't, is it applied to a domain, sub domain or on a page by page basis. Is it algorithmic or manual, etc, etc. There is just too much that we don't know to be able to say definitively "Yes" they are ignored or "No" they are not. Anyway, we're getting away from the topic... which is spamming Wikipedia which I don't condone. I only came in because I saw that Avelina had made the effort to spam that page, write all that content and then spell her own web site wrong thus rendering the link useless anyway
in order to get back links from wikipedia, just upload quality content giving links that point to you website