I use un.co.ver but note smaller sites PR1- are rarely indexed in un.co.ver's code. It's a free option without need for user login for article rewriting content checking. There is really no realistic way to find duplicate video/image content aside from specific keyword search. And seriously name calling is not a valid way to debate a topic
When the original post refers to Copyspace for content my question is why? As as a person that also reviews articles for article directory submission, I would rather see an article that is not 100% Copyscape. A cheap spinner can easy cause an article to be 100%. I look for quality, structuring, and especially creativity. Those articles uses comparisons, similes, quotations, and analogy use, thereby being very enjoyable to read, and crafted by a skilled writer. Of course, there is no way they would be 100% Copyscape. Sounds like your work boss, is bossing you around a little to much. Google does not have this Copyscape mentality. You must be writing very boring material that 5,000 people have already covered. When you want to start writing creatively and earning money is when you change YOUR thinking. Find clients that want writers that do not put readers into a coma. It is a true fact that over 50% of the articles readers start reading they do not finish. It could be very likely that 90% pass Copyspace 100%. Is it not time to get some confidence and put some of your originality into your writing. At the present time you are competing with PLR articles, that I can kick out over 40 per hour, all 100% pass copyscape. Do you want to imitate a robot? Take some personal pride and concentrate on quality, originality, and creativity. Your prices will also become something to be proud of. That is the best check $$$ of content your will ever get.
Very true! Its hard to create a fresh content unless you know well your topic and you know how to depend it. Since there are numerous article plagiarism checker over the net, the best option her is in Copyscape or ArticleChecker.
WHEN ARE SOME OF YOU GOING TO WISE UP!------ COPYSPACE DOES NOT MEASURE QUALITY OR EVEN ORIGINALITY OF CONTENT! This is at least the 6th post of this, in the last few months! Anyone with any ability can write content that is "measured" 70% Copyspace. From there it is also 45% more original. If the writer is a pro it might be 90% higher quality. Get the loose screws out. 100% was made by sweatshop-drivers. I know of no article directory of any quality that would be stupid enough to check Copyscape. If they did 70% of the articles that receive would simply be thru a cheap spinner than gives 100% copyspace at least 35 times per duplicated article. Google does not care, unless it over 70%. Imagine trying to write an article about a Shakespeare piece and being 100% Copyspace? The only writers that still have this mentality let the people that pay them, dictate them like a puppet. It is YOUR job to educate the writer, and to also submit the article. Article writing for a website and for a article directory have fully different sets of rules. Quit being a puppet of a uneducated puppet master. You show the reasons, and that person will pay you more and be your client for life. If enough people want, I will even print out a form that you can use. FREE without my name on it, you use yours and take the credit. Let's stop these stupid discussions filled with tons of misconceptions. After 20 years, I have never had a client of mine ask me that. So learn, or go to any forum. This should not even be Writing 101 subject matter. -------------these posts just show blind following the blind, use your mind------------------BELIEVE ME YOU WOULD BE AN IDIOT TO REFUTE WHAT YOU SHOULD BE SINKING INTO YOU HEAD----------------------
I see you are still posting crap to make yourself look so intelligent, when in actuality, you are showing yourself to be a complete idiot. Uhhhh, nobody here is talking about "quality," fool. And, yes, Copyscape does indeed work well over others on how to check originality of content. Ah yes, more numbers to make yourself seem like you are somebody. Oh, lookie, more numbers. Show where Google states that. We are talking about the same thing, what the OP wants answers to. Jesus, this loon is off his meds again, and seeing things that aren't there. I highly doubt you have any clients. And your posts clearly show that you did 20 years (if that is even true) of pure crap.
P. Hamburger get off the ground and read: Duplicate content on a site is not grounds for action on that site unless it appears that the intent of the duplicate content is to be deceptive and manipulate search engine results. If your site suffers from duplicate content issues, and you don't follow the advice listed above, we do a good job of choosing a version of the content to show in our search results. However, if our review indicated that you engaged in deceptive practices and your site has been removed from our search results, review your site carefully. If your site has been removed from our search results, review our webmaster guidelines for more information. Once you've made your changes and are confident that your site no longer violates our guidelines, submit your site for reconsideration. Source = Google Webmaster tools with no mention of Copyscape or any other similar tool. For others--check "Search Engine Watch", the authority site. It clearly states that Copyscape is 90% accurate, so how can you prove 100% passed Copyscape? ------original = quality.
You mean displaying your huge and elegant vocabulary worthy of a writer, or are you referring to the absence of any intelligence to speak off? Go ahead childish one, tighten the rope around your neck
You mean displaying your huge and elegant vocabulary worthy of a writer, or are you referring to the absence of any intelligence to speak off? Go ahead childish one, tighten the rope around your neck.. Again, it is so easy. Thank you.
Why do you keep believing PR Hamburger about Copyscape?. GOOGLE DOES NOT USE COPYSCAPE, COPYSCAPE USES GOOGLE If you ever want to make money, get this in your head. Yes Perry, my knowledge on this is planets above yours. Yes Perry, I have earned over $1,000,000 in a year (before taxes) Yes Perry, you are ignorant. Google does not count the first person that wrote an article, but the first one the had it indexed first. Others are rarely punished for using it. Yes, Perry, there is no penalty for duplicate content unless it uses to try to manipulate Google. Yes Perry, Google does not use Copyscape as a rating factor, it has its own superior program. Yes Perry, You can report abuse of your material to Google, however if the material is indexed they will handle it. Yes Perry, Writers and Article Buyers think the sky is falling in, as running Copyscape will not prove anything, that a $7 software program can alter Yes Perry, You will always be a hamburger writer, as you keep others on this forum from learning. Yes Perry, You can not write a post because you have nothing to offer. Yes Perry, on behalf of all the intelligent people here this is my tribute speech to you. To others, if you want to earn, it is time to learn. Unless you are one of those in misery that needs Perry's company---
Copyscape or any other online tool will always be something less than 100% because they all have the same limitation - the copied content must appear somewhere on the Internet AND be indexed. A writer can easily get 0 matches from Copyscape and Google and still plagiarize 100% - just by using printed material. Whether or not a writer is stealing someone else's work and selling it as their own is all about integrity and honesty. I've only had one client insist that my work pass Copyscape and I almost did not take him as a client because of it. Not because I had any fear of failing Copyscape but because it told me our relationship was being built upon distrust.
Excellent example, that only a professional writer could give. Now that is a person I would refer higher paying clients to. If I were a client, it would also be the type I want to use again. Smart people want to work with smart writers that guide them in the right direction. If you are unqualified to give advice, better start learning to give correct advice. Professionals get paid more, because they freely provide helpful advice.
Nothing wrong with helping a few folks along the way, but lets leave the meat out of the discussion. Every time I visit here I end up in my kitchen late at night This being said I move for a new description for the Perry type We could classify it like movies a B(ooze) writer perhaps?
As said in other thread, my eyes are hurting today to read in full forty messages posted here, but I will say someone suggested me www.iThenticate.com as a Copyscape alternative. Not tried yet, but thought to share it with you.
There are so many sources they can not check, and there are so many ways to fool them, that these tools are completely useless for the purpose the memberships are sold for.