http://images.google.com/images?q=N97 http://images.google.com/images?q=Nokia+97 Out of 21 Results , just 3 Are Correct ?
http://i40.tinypic.com/jl2kvm.jpg only one is Correct , All others are Fake N97 models http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_n97-pictures-2615.php
haha , i think the reason is N97 was delayed for a long time.. so all the Fake Ones became Original in the Eyes on Google. but it should have updated the result long long ago..too bad google
Images that being shown on google images search won't necessary be accurate to what it is supposed to be. If you posted an image named as N97 and even it's not exactly the item, google images search could only read the image name, it's "alt" tag, and your overall site's content to determine which results it should appear at.
I think the word you were looking for was "relevant" rather than relative. But since I hate Google with my very heart and soul, I would have to say they are as relevant as you believe them to be. How relevant is the trash people put on the Internet? That is a more relevant inquiry in my view. I think 99.9% of websites possess some amount of garbage that we could do without that usually shows up on search engines like Google. Is that their fault? Not really. Crafty little SEO guys sit around and do nothing but devise devious plots to get their irrelevant data on page one. So that is your thought for the day. Who is more irrelevant? Shady SEO guys or Google? Toss up? Probably.
yes i agree , there is no other way for google to find the relevant Images other than what keyword it has in the ALT tag.. but they should update the Result page from time to time.. BadBoyzStudioZ, right relevant is more appropriate ,my bad
No bad. I just think Google should die a slow, painful, agonizing death so I talked more than I should have maybe... And you gave me something to rant about. So thank you, I feel better now.