Hi, My post was for laugh! Your decision of free service is appreciated. Free services for good cause has its own strength. And I appreciate your decision to extend your services at no cost. Even I worked with an animation company without taking salary for one month (for gaining experinece).
if you have a GOOD reputation that price isnt bad at all...ill rather pay high rather than to pay lower if the design looks like sh*t
Not too low not to high...Clients are more creative than a designer. They have concrete vision as to how their web site must look. Only thing they can' t express their views in colors. Whether webdesigners/graphic artists taking more or less client will have his final output from designers as per his expectations. It does not mean that if he is paying less to webdesigner he accept all the sh*t that has been emitted from creativity. Let us be reasonable. Reasonable people are reputed people. Regards Ramakrishna
Mostly depends upon the quality of designer who is designing your site..... if he/she is stand on some high rank amoungs other definalty cost high
i have payed £2,500 pounds for this website www.tres-chic.co.uk. is this price right and i need help fixing a few things? help please
I charge a flat rate of only $300 check out one of my websites www 7phifty7 com then contact me on fb marv hookmonsta
[obviousjoke]Cool, Make me an exact clone of youtube, and i need it in 3 days, chop chop.[/obviousjoke]
It depends. A good site can easily run $1,500(+), and a bad one can be $50. It's all about the quality that you want.